跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 14:31 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 15:28 — 2026-11-08 15:28(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 14:31最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 14:29(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2609.02977

Learning Fourier-Sparse Signals and Multiband Signals

Dongrun Cai, Xue Chen, Xiaowei Shao, Yile Wang

原文摘要

A classical problem in continuous sparse Fourier transforms, which dates back to Prony's work in 1795, is to learn a $k$-Fourier-sparse signal $x(t):=\sum_{j=1}^k α_j e^{2 π\mathbf{i} f_j t}$ with arbitrary $k$ frequencies $f_1,\ldots,f_k \in \mathbb{R}$. We consider this learning problem within a fixed time window $t \in [-1,1]$ in the presence of bounded $L_2$ adversarial noise. Because the frequencies $f_1,\ldots,f_k$ can be arbitrarily close, accurately recovering individual frequencies is information-theoretically impossible even under exponentially small noise from Moitra (STOC 2015). This work therefore examines two fundamental questions: If an algorithm uses $\tilde{O}(k)$ frequencies to approximate $f_1,\ldots,f_k$ of $x$, what is the optimal covering error? And how can we efficiently learn the continuous signal $x(t)$ as a whole over the time window? Our main result is an algorithm running in time $\tilde{O}(k)$ that outputs a list $L$ of $\tilde{O}(k)$ frequencies with covering error $O(k)$ --- meaning that for most frequencies $f_j$ of $x$, $L$ guarantees $\min_{\tilde{f} \in L} |f_j-\tilde{f}| = O(k)$ --- and an reconstruction $\tilde{x}(t) \approx x(t)$ over $[-1,1]$. When constrained to outputting $\tilde{O}(k)$ frequencies, this $O(k)$ covering error is nearly optimal: Chen and Price (ICALP 2019) demonstrated two indistinguishable $k$-Fourier-sparse signals separated by distance $\tildeΩ(k^2)$ in the frequency domain, which implies an amortized lower bound of $\tildeΩ(k)$ per frequency. Furthermore, our sample and time complexities are nearly optimal, dramatically improving upon the previous best algorithm by Song, Sun, Weinstein, and Zhang (FOCS 2023), which required $\tilde{O}(k^4)$ samples and $\tilde{O}(k^{4ω})$ running time.

cs.DS

版本更新 · v3arXiv:2606.20777

Nearly Optimal Submodular Sparsification, with and without Cardinality Constraints

Zhengting Bao, Dongrun Cai, Xue Chen, Yuchen He, Chihao Zhang

原文摘要

We study the sparsification of decomposable submodular functions: given a sum $F(S) = \sum_{i=1}^m f_i(S)$ of $m$ nonnegative submodular functions on an $n$-element ground set $[n]$ (without assuming monotonicity or symmetry), the goal is to find a sparse reweighting $\widetilde{F}(S) = \sum_{i=1}^m w_i f_i(S)$ with at most $s \ll m$ nonzero weights that preserves $F(S)$ within a $(1 \pm \varepsilon)$ factor across a target family of queries. For all subset queries $S \subseteq [n]$, we give a polynomial-time randomized algorithm that constructs a sparsifier of size $O(n^2 \log n / \varepsilon^2)$. This improves upon the previous best upper bound of $O(n^3 / \varepsilon^2)$ by Kenneth and Krauthgamer and resolves their open conjecture up to a logarithmic factor, matching the $Ω(n^2)$ lower bound from directed cuts. Motivated by capacity budgets in submodular applications and the Restricted Isometry Property (RIP) in compressed sensing, we further study submodular sparsification under a cardinality constraint $|S| \le k$, and obtain a polynomial-time algorithm that constructs a sparsifier of size $O(n k \log n / \varepsilon^2)$, nearly matching the $Ω(nk)$ lower bound. This shows that a cardinality constraint unconditionally reduces the size of general submodular sparsifiers by a factor of roughly $k/n$; we complement this with $Ω(n)$ lower bounds showing that even regular symmetric or almost-regular monotone submodular functions cannot be sparsified to $o(n)$ size for $k = 2$ and $k = 1$, respectively.

cs.DS