Zixiao Wang, Duzhen Zhang, Xingbo Du, Dongxia Wu, Le Song
Responses with headers, lists and greater length receive high scores from reward models (RMs), and RLHF policies learn to produce these features even when true quality does not improve. Practitioners therefore edit their RMs, but they learn whether an edit works only after an RL run. We show that the response of a policy to an RM edit can be forecast before training, from samples of the current policy and the scores of the old and new RM. If we read the RM as a set of prices, the first-order theory of KL-regularized RL implies that each feature moves in proportion to its within-prompt covariance with the change in reward. We implant controlled price changes into retrained RMs under a 2^(4-1) fractional factorial design with a self-distilled placebo, run 54 RL runs from six parent policies, and fix every forecast before the runs. With the covariance predictor, we predict the direction of all 20 changes in supply whose forecast has the same sign at every parent and explain 82% of the standardized change. With counterfactual prices, the classical alternative, we explain 50%. The forecast also holds under GRPO and for real RM upgrades, where we explain 66% out of sample with a coefficient frozen from the factorial runs. For rent, the gap between the proxy reward and a gold reward from stronger judges, we rank RM edits correctly with the same covariance over the first 30 steps (Spearman 0.94). This measures the horizon of the forecast: by step 200, the ranking of the factorial edits reverses under both RLOO and GRPO, while the real upgrades keep their order. When we vary the KL coefficient beta, the initial response does not depend on beta, and the response saturates below the KL equilibrium. In one experiment, the long-run response to a price rise is consistent with an additional implicit regularizer beta_0 of about 0.003 to 0.007.
Xuanle Zhao York University and Institute of automation, Chinese academy of science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zilin Sang, Yuxuan Li, Qi Shi Tsinghua University, Weilun Zhao ModelBest, Shuo Wang, Duzhen Zhang Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, Xu Han Tsinghua University, Tsinghua University 等 10 位作者
Efficient reproduction of research papers is pivotal to accelerating scientific progress. However, the increasing complexity of proposed methods often renders reproduction a labor-intensive endeavor, necessitating profound domain expertise.To address this, we introduce the paper lineage, which systematically mines implicit knowledge from the cited literature. This algorithm serves as the backbone of our proposed , a multi-agent framework designed to autonomously reproduce experimental code in a complete, end-to-end manner. To ensure code executability, incorporates a sampling-based unit testing strategy for rapid validation. To assess reproduction capabilities, we introduce , a benchmark featuring verified implementations, alongside comprehensive metrics for evaluating both reproduction and execution fidelity. Extensive evaluations on PaperBench and demonstrate that consistently surpasses existing baselines across all metrics. Notably, it yields substantial improvements in reproduction fidelity and final execution performance. The code is available at https://github.com/AI9Stars/AutoReproduce.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.MA
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表