跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 18:37 — 2026-11-04 18:37(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 4 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1770ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Emergent Misalignment via In-Context Learning: Narrow in-context examples can produce broadly misaligned LLMs

Nikita Afonin, Nikita Andriianov, Vahagn Hovhannisyan, Nikhil Bageshpura, Kyle Liu Algoverse AI Research, Kevin Zhu Algoverse AI Research, Sunishchal Dev RAND Corporation and Algoverse Coding Academy LLC, Ashwinee Panda TogetherAI and University of Maryland, College Park 等 12 位作者

Recent work has shown that narrow finetuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMs, a phenomenon termed emergent misalignment (EM). While concerning, these findings were limited to finetuning and activation steering, leaving out in-context learning (ICL). We therefore ask: does EM emerge in ICL? We find that it does: across four model families (Gemini, Kimi-K2, Grok, and Qwen), narrow in-context examples cause models to produce misaligned responses to benign, unrelated queries. With 16 in-context examples, EM rates range from 1% to 24% depending on model and domain, appearing with as few as 2 examples. Neither larger model scale nor explicit reasoning provides reliable protection, and larger models are typically even more susceptible. Next, we formulate and test a hypothesis, which explains in-context EM as conflict between safety objectives and context-following behavior. Consistent with this, instructing models to prioritize safety reduces EM while prioritizing context-following increases it. These findings establish ICL as a previously underappreciated vector for emergent misalignment that resists simple scaling-based solutions.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-srw.115ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Evolutionary Search for Automated Design of Uncertainty Quantification Methods

Mikhail Seleznyov AXXX, Daniil Korbut Amazon, Viktor Moskvoretskii EPFL - EPF Lausanne, Oleg Somov DS-NLP Group, Moscow Independent Research Institute of Artificial Intelligence and AXXX, Alexander Panchenko S-NLP group, Elena Tutubalina

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods for large language models are predominantly designed by hand based on domain knowledge and heuristics, limiting their scalability and generality. We apply LLM-powered evolutionary search to automatically discover unsupervised UQ methods represented as Python programs. On the task of atomic claim verification, our evolved methods outperform strong manually-designed baselines, achieving up to 6.7% relative ROC-AUC improvement across 9 datasets while generalizing robustly out-of-distribution. Qualitative analysis reveals that different LLMs employ qualitatively distinct evolutionary strategies: Claude models consistently design high-feature-count linear estimators, while Gpt-oss-120B gravitates toward simpler and more interpretable positional weighting schemes. Surprisingly, only Sonnet 4.5 and Opus 4.5 reliably leverage increased method complexity to improve performance – Opus 4.6 shows an unexpected regression relative to its predecessor. Overall, our results hint that LLM-powered evolutionary search is a promising paradigm for automated, interpretable hallucination detector design.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 4: Student Research Workshop) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-srw.127ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

One Task Vector is not Enough: A Large-Scale Study for In-Context Learning

Pavel Tikhonov, Ivan Oseledets Institute of Numerical Mathematics, Elena Tutubalina

In-context learning (ICL) enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to adapt to new tasks using few examples, with task vectors, defined as specific hidden state activations hypothesized to encode task information. Existing studies are limited by small-scale benchmarks, restricting comprehensive analysis. We introduce QᴜɪᴛᴇAFᴇᴡ, a novel dataset of 3,096 diverse few-shot tasks, each with 30 input-output pairs derived from the Alpaca dataset. Experiments with Llama-3-8B on QᴜɪᴛᴇAFᴇᴡ reveal: (1) task vector performance peaks at an intermediate layer (e.g., 15th), (2) effectiveness varies significantly by task type, and (3) complex tasks rely on multiple, subtask-specific vectors rather than a single vector, suggesting distributed task knowledge representation.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 4: Student Research Workshop) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-srw.46ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

The Silence of the Facts: Popularity as a Barrier to Machine Unlearning

Anna Borisiuk DS-NLP Group, Andrey Savchenko HSE University, Alexander Panchenko S-NLP group, Elena Tutubalina

Machine Unlearning is a valuable ability of LLMs, enabling the removal of unsafe, outdated, or private information. Existing unlearning methods, however, are often evaluated under the assumption that all facts are equally challenging to forget. Controllable knowledge removal is essential for reliable NLP systems. In this paper, we investigate whether fact popularity influences the efficiency of LLM unlearning. To answer this question, we build UNLamb benchmark designed to systematically investigate this relationship. It consists of 11.6k question-answer pairs derived from real-world knowledge in Wikidata, explicitly partitioned into rare and popular facts. Using this benchmark, we perform a comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art unlearning algorithms on a set of models of different sizes. We conduct a comprehensive analysis of four unlearning methods across three validation sets and two LLMs. We show that larger models struggle more to forget popular entities, often damaging related knowledge in the process. In contrast, it is much easier to remove rare facts without side effects.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 4: Student Research Workshop) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗