跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 21:48 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 22:28 — 2026-11-08 22:28(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 21:48最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 21:46(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05985

Quantum Key Exchange from Public Quantum Money

Eli Goldin, Tomoyuki Morimae

原文摘要

Two-message quantum key exchange (2QKE) cannot be realized in a statistically secure way, and therefore some computational assumptions are required. So far, the known weakest assumption for 2QKE is the existence of one-way functions (OWFs). Can we construct 2QKE from a weaker assumption than OWFs? In this paper, we give the first complete characterization of 2QKE. We show that the following four primitives are (existentially) equivalent: everlasting-secure 2QKE, standard 2QKE, efficiently-verifiable state puzzles (EV-StatePuzzs), and one-time secure digital signatures with quantum signatures and signing keys. Because EV-StatePuzzs are potentially weaker than OWFs [Kretschmer, Qian and Tal 2025], the equivalence implies that 2QKE are potentially weaker than OWFs. Moreover, our result shows the equivalence between standard 2QKE and everlasting-secure 2QKE, which means that everlasting security comes for free. Finally, one-shot signatures, quantum lightning, and public-key quantum money mini-schemes imply EV-StatePuzzs, and therefore, our result also gives a new lowerbound, namely everlasting-secure 2QKE, of these public-key unclonable primitives. We also show that one-shot signatures imply QPKE with quantum public keys. [Kitagawa, Morimae,Nishimaki and Yamakawa, 2024] constructed QPKE with quantum public keys from OWFs, and it was open whether QPKE with quantum public keys can be constructed from an assumption weaker than or incomparable to OWFs. Our result gives a potential answer to this question since one-shot signatures seem to be incomparable with OWFs. Moreover, QPKE constructed from one-shot signatures has an additional functionality, which we call certified freeze, that allows the receiver to publish a publicly verifiable classical certificate that computationally binds the receiver to an upper bound on the total number of distinct valid ciphertexts under its verification key.

quant-ph · cs.CR

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05303

量子优势对复杂性理论影响甚微

Quantum Advantage has Few Complexity Implications

Eli Goldin, Alex Lombardi, Tomoyuki Morimae

AI 速读 基于摘要

作者通过构造经典与酉 oracle,表明量子性证明和量子验证者 oblivious 态制备可与 P=NP、BQP=QCMA 等计算易性共存,因而量子优势对复杂性理论的含义有限。

quant-ph · cs.CC · cs.CR

查看原文摘要

We consider the complexity implications of proofs of quantumness and (quantum verifier) oblivious state preparation. We show that both of these objects can coexist with the easiness of nondeterministic computation. That is, we give evidence that proofs of quantumness can exist when $\mathsf{P} = \mathsf{NP}$ and that (quantum verifier) oblivious state preparation can exist when $\mathsf{BQP} = \mathsf{QCMA}$. In particular, we give a classical oracle relative to which (1) $\mathsf{P}^\mathcal{O} = \mathsf{NP}^\mathcal{O}$ (2) $\mathsf{BQP}^\mathcal{O} = \mathsf{PSPACE}^\mathcal{O}$ (3) Proofs of quantumness exist. In particular, there exists a language in $\mathsf{IP}^\mathcal{O} \subseteq \mathsf{BQP}^\mathcal{O}$ which is hard on average against $\mathsf{P}^\mathcal{O}/poly$. We give a unitary oracle such that (1) $\mathsf{BQP}^\mathcal{O} = \mathsf{QCMA}^\mathcal{O}$ (2) Quantum verifier oblivious state preparation exists. These oracle separations directly imply a number of related consequences. For example, our first result implies that proofs of quantumness cannot be used to construct classical or quantum cryptography with a relativizing proof. Our second result implies that quantum computation/classical communication oblivious transfer cannot be used to construct post-quantum one-way functions with a relativizing proof.