跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1004新增论文
+764其中 AI 相关
+53已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 11:08 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-06 11:08各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 11:28 — 2026-11-06 11:28(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 11:08最近发现新增版本:2026-11-06 11:08库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 21:31

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

16,570 已收录论文14,246 AI 相关3,741 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 11:06(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.06100

Reconciling Privacy with Provenance for Language Model Watermarks

Elise L. Han, Tatsunori Hashimoto

Watermarking has great potential for regulating the use of language models (LMs), but its deployment has been marred by controversy, as many users argue that fine-grained tracking of LM usage violates their privacy. This tension reduces the effectiveness of watermarks, as users engage in evasion strategies such as paraphrasing that can remove much of the watermark signal. We show that provenance and privacy can be reconciled if we shift the goal of watermark design from tracking individuals to estimating aggregate usage. We develop locally differentially private watermarks which provably limit the evidence that any individual text can contribute to detection, while still enabling accurate estimation of population frequencies. We introduce the Red-Green Sequence (RGS) watermark, a private and computationally efficient watermark that achieves accurate frequency estimation at high privacy levels across various models, sample sizes and generation entropies in settings that reflect realistic deployment scenarios. On C4 language modeling tasks, we attain $0.0019$ MSE with $0.0038$ mean absolute bias at a low $\varepsilon$ of 1, while in more challenging settings such as an essay writing task with only 100 text samples, we still find errors on the order of $0.0113$ MSE with $0.004$ mean absolute bias at $\varepsilon=2$.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CR · cs.AI · cs.CL
arXiv ↗PDF ↗