跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+788新增论文
+627其中 AI 相关
+81已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 11:20 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 11:19各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 12:56 — 2026-11-09 12:56(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 11:20最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 11:19库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 21:58

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,888 已收录论文15,288 AI 相关4,419 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 11:19(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.08785

Learning from How Users Interpret: Personalizing Recommendation Explanation Order

Deo Munduku, Elsa Negre

原文摘要

Personalized explanations typically adapt their content or presentation based on preferences, interaction histories, or other user characteristics. We examine whether regularities inferred from prior textual interpretations can support personalization of explanation organization. In a controlled within participant study with 122 participants, prior interpretations were represented along three dimensions: information selection, relative salience, and relational organization. The relational dimension was partially operationalized through co mobilization. These representations were aggregated into fixed historical profiles and used to organize otherwise identical explanation sentences. Participants encountered four organization procedures: the OWN historical profile, the DONOR historical profile, a population profile called POP, and a language model procedure using the historical profile called PROFILE LLM. Post exposure objective comprehension was the primary outcome. OWN achieved 86.5 percent correct responses, compared with 66.0 percent for DONOR, 63.9 percent for POP, and 73.0 percent for PROFILE LLM. Mixed effects analyses showed higher comprehension with OWN than with each alternative procedure. No reliable overall condition effect was detected for recommendation acceptance. These findings indicate that historical profiles derived from prior interpretations can provide an actionable signal for personalizing explanation order while keeping explanatory content and wording fixed.

cs.HC · cs.AI