跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 07:11 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 08:06 — 2026-11-08 08:06(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 07:11最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 07:09(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02040

Multicriteria Recommendation System by Leveraging Predefined, Implicit, and Undefined Criteria

Emrul Hasan, Chen Ding

原文摘要

Data sparsity, a long-standing problem in the recommendation system, occurs when the user-item utility matrix is sparse. For years, many approaches have been experimented with, including utilizing user's textual reviews and multiple criteria ratings. In a review-based recommendation system, user preferences and item attributes are learned from reviews, while in multi-criteria recommendation systems, criteria ratings are used for the recommendation task. Multi-criteria are domain-specific pre-defined explicit criteria and users are bound to provide feedback only on these criteria with discrete values. On the contrary, users are free to express their opinions through textual reviews, which can cover multiple perspectives or aspects. It is possible that these pre-defined, domain-specific explicit criteria are not enough to fully capture the multi-faceted user preferences. To this end, we propose a novel multi-criteria recommendation model that utilizes predefined, implicit, and undefined criteria. We use a semantic similarity-based sentence clustering method to identify the predefined and implicit criteria and a sentiment analyzer to estimate their ratings. The criteria that are extracted from the review and are aligned with predefined criteria are referred to as implicit criteria. A sentence is considered as expressing opinions on an undefined criterion if the similarity score between this sentence and all the predefined criteria is lower than a predefined threshold. Ratings are computed for each extracted implicit criterion and the undefined criterion based on the review content. Finally, we use all three types of criteria and an aggregation model to make the final rating prediction for the recommendation system. Our proposed method demonstrates the superiority compared to several baselines on TripAdvisor and Beer Advocate datasets.

cs.IR

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02019

Multi-criteria Rating and Review based Recommendation Model

Emrul Hasan, Chen Ding, Alfredo Cuzzocrea

原文摘要

These days, due to the advancement of information technology, recommendation system has become one of the key tools for e-commerce business. E-commerce platforms allow users to provide feedback in both written comments and numerical ratings. Recommendation systems are utilized to recommend users to new or unseen items based on these previously collected comments or ratings. In recent years, multi-aspect or multi-criteria based recommendation systems have been studied a lot by the recommendation research community. However, these research works are conducted either with reviews or ratings, not with both. In this project, we argue that integrating both textual reviews (with multiple aspects) and numerical multi-criteria ratings can further enhance the overall rating prediction accuracy. We propose a Multi-criteria Rating and Review based Recommendation model (MRRRec). We show that incorporating multi-criteria ratings into multi-aspect ratings from reviews has a great impact on performance. Our proposed model outperforms several state-of-the-art models such as ANR, DeepCoNN, and Deep Multi-criteria Recommendation System in terms of MSE, MAE, precision, recall, and F1. We show that our proposed model achieves an average of 19% and 23.0% lower MSE and MAE respectively and 7.0%, 1.0% and 3.8% higher precision, recall, and F1 score respectively. We further show that our model performs significantly better with Word2Vec word embedding than the GloVe word embedding method.

cs.IR