跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+3758新增论文
+2871其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+82新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 00:46 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 00:57各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 00:59 — 2026-11-05 00:59(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 00:46最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 00:57库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

12,435 已收录论文10,546 AI 相关3,088 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 00:44(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.34913

Quantile-Based Command-Reserve MPC for Current-Command Gimbal Pointing

Yaokun Lu, Yifan Li, Enmei Wang, Hao Teng, Pengwei Hu, Jianzhong Qiao

This paper studies the constrained line-of-sight pointing control problem of a two-axis current-command gimbal subjected to mismatched mechanical disturbances. Friction, torque ripple, current-response lag, model mismatch, and limited drive commands make accurate pointing more challenging yet interesting. A quantile disturbance predictor is proposed to compensate predictable acceleration residuals and describe their remaining uncertainty, with the aid of learning median and outer quantiles from state, command, and reference histories. A tube-inspired model predictive controller is proposed to reserve command headroom according to prediction uncertainty, with the aid of calibrated radii and stage-dependent input margins. The median improves the nominal prediction, while the radius adapts the command reserve without adding optimization variables. A finite-horizon tube inclusion result is established for a specified linear error model and fixed ancillary policy; its conditions are distinguished from the approximations used in hardware. Native command bounds and a final command limiter keep the sent commands within their prescribed range. On a two-axis embedded platform, four controller configurations are compared in seven repeated trials each. The proposed configuration achieves a two-dimensional pointing root-mean-square error of $3.94 \pm 0.10$ mrad with no command-limit samples in the evaluation windows. Its performance supports the combined use of residual prediction and adaptive command margins in the tested operating condition. Solver times and logged loop overruns are reported separately for the nominal 100 Hz implementation.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.RO · eess.SY
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.34849

Physics-Informed and Data-Driven Composite Disturbance Separation and Predictive Control for Airborne Electro-Optical Gimbals with Multiple Constraints

Yaokun Lu, Yifan Li, Zhixuan Zhang, Enmei Wang, Hao Teng, Jianzhong Qiao

This paper studies the constrained pointing control problem of airborne electro-optical gimbals subjected to composite periodic and aperiodic disturbances. Under carrier vibration, input delay, and actuator constraints, achieving line-of-sight stabilization and tracking is challenging. A disturbance-separated model predictive control (MPC) scheme is proposed to compensate these heterogeneous disturbances according to their physical characteristics. An adaptive periodic observer predicts multi-harmonic vibrations over the MPC horizon using linear-regression frequency estimation. A linear observer estimates the aperiodic disturbance, and a bounded long short-term memory (LSTM) network predicts its change over the input delay. Embedding periodic predictions into the MPC model while applying aperiodic compensation outside the optimizer limits amplification of aperiodic estimation errors and improves pointing accuracy under frequency changes and parameter mismatch. On the stated headroom envelope, input-set tightening provides feasible commands within the prescribed limits, and a regional practical tracking bound is established under explicit input-sequence and predicted-state margin conditions. A UAV-mounted two-axis gimbal platform is assembled for comparative indoor hovering experiments, complemented by simulations under frequency changes and parameter mismatch. In the reported trials, the proposed method achieves yaw and pitch relative-angle root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) of 0.770 degrees and 0.350 degrees, reducing tracking errors by 25.1% and 45.9% compared with linear active disturbance rejection control.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.RO · eess.SY
arXiv ↗PDF ↗