Embodied visual tracking requires a robot to follow a language-specified person under occlusion, look-alike distractors, and ambiguous instructions. We show that improving tracking persistence can simultaneously increase safety violations. Using a compact 0.6B vision-language-action (VLA) tracker with a frozen backbone, we update only the planner head with proximal policy optimization (PPO). PPO improves success and following rates across all three EVT-Bench settings, but increases the collision rate on distracted tracking because episodes that previously ended in target loss can instead end in contact. We introduce TRACE, an execution-time target-state risk gate that preserves the learned policy and intervenes selectively. A lightweight risk head processes 84 cues, including candidate boxes, identity margins, a learned range-and-bearing probe, and the policy's commands. When the calibrated risk exceeds a threshold, TRACE rescales the translational component of the next waypoint while leaving yaw unchanged. The executed action is identical to PPO's on more than 98% of steps. In paired evaluations on identical episodes, TRACE reduces the distracted-tracking collision rate by 3.96 percentage points, while further improving success and following rates. Matched slowdown controls without target-state timing do not reproduce this improvement. Concurrent evaluation reproduces a collision reduction of 3.77 points, compared with 0.29 points for identical-arm null pairs, indicating that the effect exceeds evaluation variability. These results show that target-state-aware execution can recover the safety cost of policy post-training with minimal intervention.
Haibo Tong, Zeyang Yue, Feifei Zhao Institute of automation, Chinese academy of science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Erliang Lin, Lu Jia, Ruolin Chen Institute of automation, Chinese academy of science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yinqian Sun Institute of automation, Chinese academy of science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qian Zhang Institute of automation, Chinese academy of science, Chinese Academy of Sciences 等 9 位作者
Whether Large Language Models (LLMs) truly possess human-like Theory of Mind (ToM) capabilities has garnered increasing attention. However, existing benchmarks remain largely restricted to narrow paradigms like false belief tasks, failing to capture the full spectrum of human cognitive mechanisms. We introduce CogToM, a comprehensive, theoretically grounded benchmark comprising over 8000 bilingual instances across 46 paradigms, validated by 49 human annotators. A systematic evaluation of 22 representative models, including frontier models like GPT-5.1 and Qwen3-Max, reveals significant performance heterogeneities and highlights persistent bottlenecks in specific dimensions. Further analysis based on human cognitive patterns suggests potential divergences between LLM and human cognitive structures. CogToM offers a robust instrument and perspective for investigating the evolving cognitive boundaries of LLMs. We release our code and data at https://github.com/Beijing-AISI/CogToM.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表