跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+6109新增论文
+5222其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 07:04 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 06:17各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 08:38 — 2026-11-05 08:38(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 07:04最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 06:17库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

14,786 已收录论文12,897 AI 相关3,089 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 07:02(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02725

AffToM: Benchmarking Recursive Affective Theory of Mind in Dynamic Multi-Party Interactions

Jinpeng Hu, Yiduo Jin, Erqiang Wang, Jia Li, Jingjing Wu, Peipei Song

Understanding emotion in realistic social interactions requires more than recognizing facial expressions or assigning affective labels. The same event can elicit different emotions depending on what each participant knows, what they believe others know or feel, and how these nested mental states evolve over time. Existing benchmarks largely study higher-order epistemic Theory of Mind (ToM) and multimodal emotion reasoning in isolation, leaving recursive affective reasoning under asymmetric and dynamically changing information underexplored. Therefore, we introduce AffToM, a benchmark for affective ToM with 1,922 test pairs and 19,759 training pairs. AffToM evaluates Individual Affective Reasoning (IAR), which infers emotions from events and socio-cognitive context, and Multi-party Affective Reasoning (MPAR), which recursively tracks participants' nested beliefs and emotions as new evidence emerges. We develop an event-driven multi-agent generation pipeline grounded in dynamic character interaction graphs that explicitly capture event sequences, interpersonal relations, and mental-state updates. Furthermore, we propose AffToM-R1, a two-stage post-training framework combining supervised fine-tuning with perspective-aware rubric-guided reinforcement learning. Experiments show that MPAR remains challenging, with even the strongest evaluated MLLM achieving less than 60% accuracy, while AffToM-R1 improves MPAR accuracy by 13.38 percentage points over its base model. Our dataset is available at: https://github.com/MindIntLab-HFUT/AffToM.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗