Bishwamittra Ghosh MPI-SWS, Soumi Das MPI-SWS, Till Speicher Aleph Alpha Research, Qinyuan Wu, Mohammad Aflah Khan, Deepak Garg MPI-SWS, Krishna P. Gummadi MPI-SWS, Evimaria Terzi Boston University, Boston University
原文摘要
Large language models (LLMs) operate in two fundamental learning modes – fine-tuning (FT) and in-context learning (ICL) – raising key questions about which mode yields greater language proficiency and whether they differ in their inductive biases. Prior studies comparing FT and ICL have yielded mixed and inconclusive results due to inconsistent experimental setups. To enable a rigorous comparison, we propose a formal language learning task – offering precise language boundaries, controlled string sampling, and no data contamination – and introduce a discriminative test for language proficiency, where an LLM succeeds if it assigns higher generation probability to in-language strings than to out-of-language strings.Empirically, we find that: (a) FT has greater language proficiency than ICL on in-distribution generalization, but both perform equally well on out-of-distribution generalization. (b) Their inductive biases, measured by the correlation in string generation probabilities, are similar when both modes partially learn the language but diverge at higher proficiency levels. (c) Unlike FT, ICL performance differs substantially across models of varying sizes and families and is sensitive to the token vocabulary of the language. Thus, our work demonstrates the promise of formal languages as a controlled testbed for evaluating LLMs, behaviors that are difficult to isolate in natural language datasets. Our source code is available at https://github.com/bishwamittra/formallm.
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表