跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 07:06 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 07:13 — 2026-11-10 07:13(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 07:06最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 07:04(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2609.35670

具有常数最大最小份额保证的期望真实机制

Truthful-in-Expectation Mechanism with Constant Maximin-Share Guarantee

Mengfan Ma, Biaoshuai Tao, Fangxiao Wang

AI 速读 基于摘要

作者提出一种期望真实(TIE)的随机分配机制,利用基数估值信息,在每次实现中都保证每位代理人至少获得其截断比例份额(TPS)的 1/6,从而也至少获得其最大最小份额(MMS)的 1/6。

cs.GT

查看原文摘要

We study the truthful and fair allocation of $m$ indivisible goods to $n$ strategic agents with additive valuations. Babaioff, Feige, and Manaker Morag (FOCS~2026) gave a randomized mechanism that uses only the agents' rankings of the goods, is truthful-in-expectation (TIE), and guarantees every agent $1/(H_{n-1}+2)=Θ(1/\log n)$ of her maximin share (MMS) in every realized allocation, where $H_{n-1}$ is the $(n-1)$th harmonic number; this is nearly the best possible with rankings alone. They conjectured that cardinal information allows TIE mechanisms to achieve a constant ex-post MMS guarantee. We confirm this conjecture: our TIE mechanism gives every agent at least $1/6$ of her truncated proportional share (TPS), and hence of her MMS, in every realized allocation. Moreover, the mechanism is ex-ante envy-free and can be implemented in polynomial time as an explicit lottery over at most $m(n-1)+1$ allocations.