跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1673新增论文
+1257其中 AI 相关
+197已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 16:21 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 14:16各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 16:48 — 2026-11-13 16:48(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 16:21最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 14:16库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,726 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 16:20(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.16257

Few-Shot Cross-Subject Neural--Image Retrieval via Stimulus-Anchored Latent Bias Calibration

Xizhang Yao, Li Zhang, Gan Huang, Zhen Liang

原文摘要

In cross-subject neural--image retrieval, comparing the mean of a few stimulus-matched target observations with the global source mean conflates subject-specific representation shifts with stimulus-composition effects. To address this problem, we propose Stimulus-Anchored Latent Bias Calibration (SA-LBC), which estimates the first-order shift under fixed preprocessing and a frozen source-trained representation by averaging residuals between target responses and same-stimulus source-population anchors, then shrinks the correction using source-derived uncertainty. Under uniform sampling without replacement from a finite stimulus population, we derive exact finite-population MSE expressions for the unshrunk anchored and global-mean estimators, including residual--anchor cross-covariance, and establish a necessary and sufficient condition for anchoring to reduce MSE relative to global-mean estimation. In a 10-subject leave-one-subject-out evaluation on THINGS-EEG2, SA-LBC increases mean reciprocal rank (MRR) for the Attention--CLIP ViT-B/32 configuration from 0.1867 without calibration to 0.2013 and 0.2336 with M=2 and M=16 stimulus-level calibration samples, respectively. Across six neural--visual configurations and all calibration budgets, stimulus-matched anchors yield higher MRR than anchors with shuffled stimulus identities, but retrieval gains over no calibration remain representation-dependent. At (M=2), shrinkage improves MRR over the unshrunk anchored estimator in all six configurations, but its effects at larger budgets vary across representations; the relative ranking of translation and orientation corrections also depends on regularization strength. Thus, lower shift-estimation MSE does not guarantee higher retrieval performance. The source code is publicly available at: https://github.com/Xizhang-Yao/SA-LBC.

cs.LG