Steering methods influence Large Language Model behavior by identifying semantic directions in hidden representations, but are typically realized through inference-time activation interventions that apply a fixed, global modification to the model's internal states. While effective, such interventions often induce unfavorable attribute-utility trade-offs under strong control, as they ignore the fact that many behaviors are governed by a small and heterogeneous subset of model components. We propose Steer2Edit, a theoretically grounded, training-free framework that transforms steering vectors from inference-time control signals into diagnostic signals for component-level rank-1 weight editing. Instead of uniformly injecting a steering direction during generation, Steer2Edit selectively redistributes behavioral influence across individual attention heads and MLP neurons, yielding interpretable edits that preserve the standard forward pass and remain compatible with optimized parallel inference. Across safety alignment, hallucination mitigation, and reasoning efficiency, Steer2Edit consistently achieves more favorable attribute-utility trade-offs: at matched downstream performance, it improves safety by up to 17.2%, increases truthfulness by 9.8%, and reduces reasoning length by 12.2% on average. Overall, Steer2Edit provides a principled bridge between representation steering and weight editing by translating steering signals into interpretable, training-free parameter updates. Our code is available at https://github.com/Trustworthy-ML-Lab/Steer2Edit
Chung-En Sun, Linbo Liu, Ge Yan, Zimo Wang, Tsui-Wei Weng
Tool-augmented LLM agents tend to call tools indiscriminately, even when the model can answer directly. Each unnecessary call wastes API fees and latency, yet no existing benchmark systematically studies when a tool call is actually needed. We propose When2Tool, a benchmark of 18 environments (15 single-hop, 3 multi-hop) spanning three categories of tool necessity -- computational scale, knowledge boundaries, and execution reliability -- each with controlled difficulty levels that create a clear decision boundary between tool-necessary and tool-unnecessary tasks. We evaluate two families of training-free baselines: Prompt-only (varying the prompt to discourage unnecessary calls) and Reason-then-Act (requiring the model to reason about tool necessity before acting). Both provide limited control: Prompt-only suppresses necessary calls alongside unnecessary ones, and Reason-then-Act still incurs a disproportionate accuracy cost on hard tasks. To understand why these baselines fail, we probe the models' hidden states and find that tool necessity is linearly decodable from the pre-generation representation with AUROC 0.89--0.96 across six models, substantially exceeding the model's own verbalized reasoning. This reveals that models already know when tools are needed, but fail to act on this knowledge during generation. Building on this finding, we propose Probe&Prefill, which uses a lightweight linear probe to read the hidden-state signal and prefills the model's response with a steering sentence. Across all models tested, Probe&Prefill reduces tool calls by 38\% with only 1.7\% accuracy loss, while the best baseline at comparable accuracy only reduces 6% of tool calls, or achieves a similar tool call reduction but incurs a 5$\times$ higher accuracy loss. Our code is available at https://github.com/Trustworthy-ML-Lab/when2tool
Chuchu Xie, Yang Zhong, Kangan Qian, Hao Ye, Kun Jiang, Diange Yang
Knowledge distillation can transfer large multimodal models to compact models for autonomous driving, but uniform token-level matching can dilute planning-relevant semantics and amplify teacher errors. We propose RSKD, a semantic-consistency-guided distillation framework that routes supervision according to both the task importance of an answer phrase and its semantic consistency with the teacher prediction. Task-critical semantic phrases are localized in the ground-truth answer, and a phrase-level consistency score controls the balance between Jensen--Shannon divergence (JSD) distillation and ground-truth supervision. Teacher information is emphasized only where it is semantically consistent, while semantically inconsistent phrases receive stronger ground-truth supervision. We evaluate RSKD on DrivingVQA, LingoQA, and MapLMv2. RSKD improves over the compared student-based baselines on DrivingVQA and LingoQA and remains competitive on MapLMv2.