跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 16:25 — 2026-11-04 16:25(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2608.20822

Interaction Effects Between Learner Characteristics and Dialogue Format in LLM- and TTS-Generated Dialogue-Based Lessons

Fumie Watanabe, Gendo Kumoi, Tota Suko, Takashi Ishida, Yuko Kuma, Manabu Kobayashi, Shigeichi Hirasawa

Large language models and text-to-speech technology enable low-cost production of dialogue-based lessons: videos in which two speakers converse. The speakers' roles can vary, but little is known about whether all learners respond alike to such differences. In a repeated-measures design, 222 first-year high school students viewed lessons in three formats: a teacher and a student (TS), two students (SS), and two teachers (TT). Within the aptitude-treatment interaction framework, linear mixed-effects models tested whether associations between learner characteristics and outcomes differed by format. The learner characteristics were experiential learning style - seeking challenging, new experiences (CE factor) and learning by reflecting on experience (RCE factor) - and critical thinking disposition; the outcomes were motivation based on the ARCS model, self-reported learning outcomes, and overall evaluation. For motivation, both factors interacted with format: the CE factor's association differed between TS and TT, and the RCE factor's slope was significantly positive in TS and SS and significantly larger in TS than TT. For learning outcomes, no interaction was detected, but critical thinking disposition was positively associated with them. For overall evaluation, again no interaction was detected, but TT was rated lowest. Given small-to-medium interaction effects, these findings are preliminary evidence to inform personalized learning design.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CY
arXiv ↗PDF ↗