跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+367新增论文
+288其中 AI 相关
+33已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 10:18 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 10:17各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 10:47 — 2026-11-09 10:47(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 10:18最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 10:17库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 12:44

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,467 已收录论文14,949 AI 相关4,222 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 10:16(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.37058

Exploring the Limits of the Delta Learning Hypothesis: Single-Pair Generator Biases in Direct Preference Optimization

Giuseppe Curci, Stefano Simonazzi, Andrea Molinari, Andrea Zugarini

原文摘要

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) typically relies on preference pairs generated from diverse model pools and ranked by an external LLM judge. The recently proposed delta-learning hypothesis suggests that comparable supervision can instead be obtained from a single pair of models by treating the larger model's response as preferred. We investigate the limits of this approach across model families and scales. We show, both theoretically and empirically, that fixed model pairs introduce systematic, generator-dependent biases that are predictive of the preference label independent of response quality. Consequently, DPO trained on single-pair data consistently underperforms multi-model preference data, despite the larger generator producing higher-quality responses, and we trace this gap to training dynamics consistent with reward hacking on these biases. We further show that simply increasing the number of generators, even without an external judge, is enough to partially mitigate this effect. Our results highlight generator diversity as a critical factor in preference-data construction.

cs.LG · cs.AI · cs.CL

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-industry.105ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Practical Guidelines for Model Merging in LLMs Pre-Training

Giuseppe Curci, Stefano Simonazzi, Andrea molinari, Andrea Zugarini

原文摘要

Model merging is widely used to combine fine-tuned models trained with different data distributions, tasks, or hyperparameters, yet its role during LLM pre-training remains underexplored. We systematically study checkpoint merging across training phases, focusing on the transition from stable to decaying learning rates. Across multiple scales, we find that simple averaging methods consistently improve performance during stable learning rate regimes, but gains sharply diminish during decay. We link this effect to reduced checkpoint diversity and show that merging effectiveness correlates with parameter-space variation. Strategies such as synthetic variability, task-vector merging, and cross-run merging yield only modest improvements. Our results provide practical insights on when merging is most effective in large-scale pre-training.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 6: Industry Track) · 2026 · 正式发表