跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 08:39 — 2026-11-04 08:39(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.39521

Certified Small Well-Separated Pair Decompositions in Practice

Guilherme D. da Fonseca

Given n points and $ε>0$, a well-separated pair decomposition (WSPD) is a collection of dumbbells {X,Y}, where X and Y have diameter at most $ε$ times their distance, such that every pair of points has one point in X and the other in Y for some dumbbell. A partition WSPD covers every pair exactly once, and a cover WSPD at least once. Callahan and Kosaraju give a partition WSPD with $O(n/ε^d)$ dumbbells in $R^d$, but many point sets have far smaller WSPDs of both kinds. For $d\ge2$, the known $O(1)$-approximations of the minimum size WSPD that preserve the separation $ε$ have unspecified factors, above $10^7$ for $d=2$ by our estimates. For cover WSPDs, we give an $O(n^2\log n)$-time sweep approximation algorithm with a factor 40 in the plane for $ε\le1/16$. It extends to $R^d$ with a factor $2^{O(d)}$. The sweep is also a lower-bound tool: its number of steps is a lower bound on the WSPD size. For partition WSPDs, we analyze quadtree and fair split tree constructions: in the plane and for $ε\le1/5$, they give constant approximation factors, the smallest of which is 252 for a randomly shifted and scaled quadtree. In experiments with $ε=1/20$, the number of sweep steps is at least 0.91 OPT for n = 500, where the optimum OPT is known, and a local search raises it to a lower bound of 0.99 OPT. A greedy variant of the sweep, which is still a certified 40-approximation, is at most 1.28 times the lower bound for n = 10000. Followed by a new local-search heuristic that shrinks the WSPD, it is within 0.02% of the optimum on every instance with n = 500, and at most 1.10 times the lower bound for n = 10000. We then show how to convert the cover WSPDs into partition WSPDs. For n = 10000, the conversion gives on average 1.13 times the lower bound, against 1.05 for the cover WSPD itself and 1.55 for the Callahan-Kosaraju partition WSPD.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗