跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-07 18:29 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-07 17:43各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-06 19:17 — 2026-11-07 19:17(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-07 18:29最近发现新增版本:2026-11-07 17:43库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-07 18:28(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.07349

From What Is Used to What Is Missing: Rethinking Dynamic Rank in LoRA

Peng Xue, Guodong Fan, Guang-Yong Chen, Xing Chen

原文摘要

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning with LoRA is governed by rank, which controls parameter budget and locally accessible task updates. Existing dynamic-rank methods mainly focus on capacity allocation, leaving unresolved whether the current adaptation space is sufficient for the task. We characterize the first-order information boundary of standard factor gradients, showing that their unobservable subspace coincides with the normal space of the low-rank manifold. Thus, factor gradients alone cannot distinguish under-optimization within the current space from task-relevant directions beyond its first-order reach. This motivates a geometric view of rank evolution, where tangent information optimizes existing degrees of freedom and the normal spectrum quantifies the value of new ones. Under a local quadratic model, we show that leading normal singular directions yield the locally optimal rank expansion, with spectral energy determining its gain. Building on this characterization, we propose GEAR, which turns the tangent--normal decomposition into rank evolution through tangent-space optimization, matrix-free normal-spectrum estimation for rank expansion, and task-induced geometric initialization. Across language and vision benchmarks, GEAR achieves the best average performance in all evaluated settings with substantially fewer trainable parameters. On LLaMA3-8B, it raises the average commonsense score from 86.61 to 88.45 while reducing trainable parameters from 42.0M to 14.4M.

math.OC · cs.LG