跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+36新增论文
+28其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-07 11:13 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-06 13:12各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-06 13:09 — 2026-11-07 13:09(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-07 11:13最近发现新增版本:2026-11-06 13:12库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-07 11:11(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2605.28048

SAFEVPR: Patch-Based Verification with Empirical FDR Control for Cross-Condition Sequence Visual Place Recognition

Ha Sier, Jiaqiang Zhang, Zhuo Zou, Xianjia Yu, Tomi Westerlund

Sequence-based visual place recognition (VPR) for loop closure and robot relocalization must decide whether the retrieved top-1 candidate should be accepted. Conformal calibration can set this accept/reject threshold, but its finite-sample guarantees require exchangeability between calibration and deployment, a requirement that cross-condition deployment violates. We therefore claim no formal guarantee under condition shift: this paper instead asks which verification score and calibration design keep a target false-discovery rate (FDR) empirically satisfied across realistic appearance change. We present SAFEVPR, a non-trainable pipeline that replaces the backbone cosine similarity with a mutual-nearest-neighbour (MNN) patch score from frozen DINOv2 features, and flat Learn-Then-Test (LTT) calibration with per-bin Clopper-Pearson thresholds. Across 23 cross-condition ground-vehicle setups (Oxford RobotCar, NCLT, St Lucia; three frozen backbones), SAFEVPR meets the FDR target on 23/23 setups at alpha = 0.10 (mean accepted FDR 0.014, mean TPR 0.75) and on 22/23 at alpha = 0.05 with 22 retaining non-trivial coverage (best cosine variant, cosine+LTT: 22/23 valid but 17 non-trivial); under leave-one-dataset-out calibration, validity drops to 20/23 with 14 retaining useful coverage (strongest cosine baseline: 16/23 and 10), and on texture-poor scenery (Nordland) the verifier is uninformative and the system abstains entirely, as it does everywhere at alpha = 0.01; we report these as limitations. In a pose-graph relocalization study, gating loop-closure constraints reduces erroneous constraints by 29.6x and cuts the median trajectory error from 95.5 m to 9.7 m. Code is available at https://github.com/TIERS/SafeVPR.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.RO
arXiv ↗PDF ↗