A unified framework for chirp-domain waveforms, including orthogonal chirp division multiplexing (OCDM) and affine frequency division multiplexing (AFDM), is developed. Their continuous-time representations are shown to fall within the conventional Weyl-Heisenberg (WH) framework for multicarrier waveforms, with the root chirp as the prototype pulse. Since the root chirp has constant envelope and is transparent to subcarrier orthogonality, these waveforms can be further interpreted as pulse-shaped (PS) orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signals, whose power spectral density is derived analytically. The derived spectrum reveals that implementations based on the discrete affine Fourier transform rely on sub-Nyquist samples and exhibit frequency aliasing. We prove that the corresponding aliased chirps are only conditionally orthogonal, whereas sample-wise root-Nyquist pulse shaping of the discrete-time AFDM (DT-AFDM) sequence produces mutually orthogonal pulse-shaped chirps, resulting in the pulse-shaped AFDM (PS-AFDM) waveform. We then derive an exact waveform-level input-output (I/O) relation for PS-AFDM over delay-Doppler (DD) channels, showing that the effective channel at a practical receiver is generally not a superposition of pure path-wise DD components. Waveform simulations verify the derived relation to machine precision, while the conventional sequence-level I/O relation for DT-AFDM exhibits a substantial mismatch with waveform behavior for practical channels with continuous-valued delays.
Modern language models are trained on far more language than children experience, but we know much less about learning from small, naturalistic datasets. We train small GPT-2 models on transcripts of speech with children from dense home recordings (BabyView) and on synthetic child-directed dialogue (TinyDialogues), varying the amount, source, and diversity of training data. Models trained on one child's language environment predict that environment substantially better than other children's environments. Much of this specialization is lexical and distributional: a simple 5-gram model reproduces the cross-child pattern (r=.91). Training on data from multiple children clearly improves prediction of pooled held-out language relative to training on a single child's input without a similarly clear improvement on grammatical benchmarks. Across data sizes, naturalistic and synthetic training inputs also produce different grammatical and lexical-semantic patterns, with important differences between grammatical phenomena. Together, these results show that small-data language learning depends not only on how much language a model sees, but on which environments it comes from and how well that input matches what the model is asked to predict.
Han Chi, Jiaxin Qi, Yan Cui, Baisheng Lai, Jianqiang Huang
Rapid advances in large language models have improved the task-solving capabilities of command-line-interface (CLI)-based agents, whose CLIs determine how models invoke tools, maintain interaction history, and recover from failures. Consequently, effective matching between CLIs and LLMs has become essential. However, existing agent benchmarks largely emphasize success rate while overlooking practical objectives such as cost and efficiency, as well as the selection of LM-CLI combinations, all of which are critical in real-world deployment. We therefore introduce AgentMeter, a quality-efficiency benchmark with a new metric, the AgentMeter Score (AMS), that jointly characterizes task quality, budget sensitivity, and resource-intensive zero-reward execution, enabling a more complete assessment of deployed LM-CLI pairs. Furthermore, collected task descriptions may inadvertently favor LM-CLI pairs that are particularly compatible with their wording and structure, causing evaluation results to reflect description-specific advantages rather than general task-solving capability. We therefore propose AgentMeter-Opt, a trajectory-grounded optimization framework that constructs pair-adapted, task-preserving description variants to build a fairer evaluation set across LM-CLI pairs. Extensive experiments show that no CLI is universally optimal across language models and that task success, execution cost, and AMS identify different competitive configurations. Results on AgentMeter-Opt further reveal that task-preserving description changes affect LM-CLI pairs unevenly and can alter their relative ordering across valid description conditions. Together, AgentMeter and AgentMeter-Opt provide a practical foundation for fair and deployment-relevant evaluation of command-line agents.
Guan Wang University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Biyu Zhou, Xuehai Tang, Jizhong Han Chinese Academy of Science, Songlin Hu
To address the increasingly severe safety risk of large language models (LLMs), reasoning-based safety alignment methods have emerged. These methods overcome the limitations of ’shallow alignment’ by exposing the model’s Chain-of-Thought (CoT), enabling auditability of safety reasoning process through both training-phase supervision and post-generation verification. However, this transparency creates a critical vulnerability, a tension we define as the Security Auditability Dilemma: while explicit reasoning is a prerequisite for safety, its textual Auditable paradoxically transforms it into an optimization target for adaptive attackers and induces the model to unintentionally copy harmful content from its own reasoning context. To address this, we propose Auditable Latent CoT Alignment (ALCA), a framework that decouples internal reasoning from external output. ALCA shifts the safety deliberation process into a continuous latent space. This allows the safety reasoning process to guide the generation of harmless outputs, while eliminates the discrete textual surface that facilitates internal copying and adaptive attack. Yet, this process is not a black box. we introduce a restricted Self-Decoding mechanism that allows the model to reconstruct its latent reasoning into human-readable text for supervision under specific guidance. Extensive experiments show that ALCA achieves robustness alignment, reducing the success rate of adaptive jailbreak attacks by over 40% compared to strong baselines, while preserving performance. Our framework presents a path toward building LLMs that are both robustly secure and auditable.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Guan Wang University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xuehai Tang, Biyu Zhou, Jizhong Han Chinese Academy of Science, Songlin Hu
Prevailing safety alignment methods still leave Large Language Models (LLMs) vulnerable to sophisticated jailbreak attacks. To bolster defenses, explicit reasoning mechanisms like Safety-oriented Chain-of-Thought (SCoT) have emerged, significantly enhancing robustness. However, this transparency introduces a critical trade-off: the exposed reasoning process itself becomes a new attack surface, risking the leakage of harmful information and revealing the model’s safety logic to adversaries. This paper directly confronts this dilemma, asking: Can we achieve the full benefits of deliberative safety without the costs of explicit reasoning generation? We propose Safety Reasoning Internalization to make the deliberative process in SCoT “available but not visible”. This approach is grounded in a key theoretical insight: the corrective influence of an SCoT can be effectively approximated by a targeted, low-rank update to the model’s Feed-Forward Network (FFN) layers. We operationalize this through Hierarchical Internalization of Adversarially-Guided Reasoning (HIAR), a layer-wise safety alignment framework that internalizes safety reasoning into an implicit computational pathway using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA). HIAR enables the model to reach a safe conclusion within a single forward pass, entirely eliminating the need to generate vulnerable SCoT text. Extensive experiments on various LLMs demonstrate that HIAR achieves a 43% lower Attack Success Rate (ASR) against distinct jailbreak attacks compared to strong baselines.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Cheng-Han Chiang, Xiaofei Wang Microsoft, Linjie Li University of Washington and Microsoft, Chung-Ching Lin, Kevin Lin Microsoft, Shujie Liu, Zhendong Wang Microsoft, Zhengyuan Yang Microsoft 等 10 位作者
Current large language models (LLMs) and spoken language models (SLMs) begin thinking and taking actions only after the user has finished their turn. This prevents the model from interacting with the user during the user’s turn and can lead to high response latency when the model is thinking. To address this issue, we draw inspiration from the “think while listening” behavior of humans. In this paper, we propose SHANKS, a general inference framework that enables SLMs to generate unspoken chain-of-thought reasoning while listening to user input. SHANKS streams input speech in fixed-duration chunks and, as soon as a chunk is received, generates unspoken reasoning based on all previous speech and reasoning, while the user continues speaking. SHANKS uses unspoken reasoning to determine whether to interrupt the user and make tool calls to complete the task. We demonstrate that SHANKS enhances real-time user–SLM interaction in two scenarios: (1) SHANKS can listen to the user’s speech and interrupt when the user makes a mistake. (2) In a tool-augmented dialogue scenario, SHANKS can complete 56.9% of the tool calls before the user ends their turn. Overall, SHANKS is a step toward models that keep thinking throughout the conversation, not only after a turn ends. Demos can be found on the project page: https://d223302.github.io/SHANKS/.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表