Hao-Yu Hsu, Tianhang Cheng, Jing Wen, Alexander G. Schwing, Shenlong Wang
Understanding human activities and the objects they interact with typically relies on visual perception, yet cameras pose persistent challenges in privacy, safety, energy efficiency, and scalability. We explore an alternative: 4D perception without vision. Its goal is to recover human motion and the objects the person interacts with purely from everyday wearable sensors. For this we introduce IMU4D, a framework that repurposes large language models for non-visual spatiotemporal understanding of human-object dynamics. IMU4D uses data from a few inertial sensors from earbuds, watches, or smartphones and predicts detailed 4D human motion together with surrounding objects the person interacts with. Experiments across diverse human motion datasets and human-object datasets show that IMU4D yields more coherent and temporally stable results than SoTA cascaded pipelines, suggesting wearable motion sensors alone can support 4D understanding of human-object interactions.
This report presents the implementation and validation of two end-to-end multimodal adaptation pipelines for 3D-aware visual question answering on a custom spatial dataset. The first pipeline fine-tunes HiSpatial-3B, which augments RGB observations with metric-scale 3D point maps; the second adapts Qwen3-VL through memory-efficient QLoRA-based supervised fine-tuning. The completed engineering stack covers dataset conversion, image-annotation alignment, monocular geometry preprocessing, instruction construction, mixed-domain training, checkpoint management, batch inference, and automated evaluation. On the target spatial benchmark, HiSpatial adaptation increases overall accuracy from 1.73% before fine-tuning to 79.89% at 3,600 steps. On a separately collected styled split, accuracy improves from 14.9% to 55.1%, indicating transfer beyond the original training set. The Qwen3-VL pipeline is likewise implemented end-to-end for both 8B- and 32B-scale models using mixed-domain QLoRA adaptation. The resulting accuracy improves from 20.74% to 45.27% for Qwen3-VL-8B and from 30.79% to 47.60% for Qwen3-VL-32B. Together, these results establish two complementary and reproducible adaptation pipelines for geometry-aware and general-purpose multimodal spatial reasoning. These results establish a reproducible engineering foundation for subsequent work on metric 3D reasoning, spatial grounding, and domain-adapted multimodal systems, while also identifying training-data composition as a central factor in preserving general multimodal capability during specialization.
Xi Cheng, Chenxi Zhai, Hang Cheng, Mingyu Fan, Pingfa Feng, Long Zeng
Parametric CAD modeling requires not only matching the target shape, but also preserving design intent under parameter edits. However, most existing methods focus on improving static shape generation accuracy, while the dependencies that govern later edits are often overlooked. To tackle this issue, we present DIP-CAD, a design-intent-preserving agent harness for generating parametric CAD models from images. DIP-CAD combines vision-language model reasoning with CAD kernel operations to establish dependencies that encode the design intent. In parametric CAD, these dependencies are mainly established through geometry references in modeling commands and constraints in parametric sketches. At the command level, ID-based explicit geometry reference binds modeling commands to selected faces, edges, or vertices. At the sketch level, a local-coordinate bridge ensures accurate sketch placement, providing the basis for correctly establishing sketch constraints. Constraints among sketch primitives and constraints to external projected geometry further preserve both internal sketch relationships and dependencies on existing geometry. To provide a more comprehensive data foundation for parametric CAD modeling tasks, we introduce the Geometry Explicit Reference Dataset (GERD), whose structured data format links stepwise modeling commands to intermediate CAD models through explicit geometry references. On GERD-EVL and a DeepCAD test subset, DIP-CAD improves mIoU for static model generation by 11.1% and 5.6%, respectively. In parameter-editing evaluations, the corresponding mIoU improvements are 7.0% and 4.2%. Case studies further demonstrate how parameter edits drive shape updates while preserving design intent.
Andie Huang, Ying Pang, Qian Zhang, Yihang Cheng, Lin Ma
Many LLMs now emit an explicit reasoning trace before they write code, but benchmark results for code generation and bug fixing usually report correctness alone. It is therefore unclear how much the extra reasoning contributes relative to the tokens it consumes. We examine this question with 866 Python tasks drawn from HumanEval Pro, MBPP Pro, and BugsInPy under five model settings. We look at the accuracy gain and token overhead of reasoning, the behaviors that appear inside reasoning traces, and whether a shortened trace still leads to a correct solution. Turning reasoning on in Qwen3-32B over five runs improves mean pass@1 on HumanEval Pro from 71.1% to 76.5% and mean tests pass on BugsInPy from 3.5% to 7.9%. On MBPP Pro the improvement from 68.1% to 69.5% is not statistically significant, even though the model uses a median of over 2,000 thinking tokens per task. Across models, a longer median trace does not reliably mean higher accuracy. A qualitative analysis shows that traces mostly choose and check an implementation in code generation, while in bug fixing they mostly locate the fault and plan the repair. We then truncate stored traces offline and ask Qwen3-32B with reasoning off to produce a solution from what remains. Retaining the first half of a trace yields no statistically significant drop in correctness. Stopping when the trace becomes repetitive seldom triggers, and stopping once solution code first appears benefits some models but harms others. Neither rule beats plain fixed truncation. These results suggest that more reasoning is not always better and that studies should report reasoning cost alongside correctness.