跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1164新增论文
+869其中 AI 相关
+88已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 04:56 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 05:47 — 2026-11-06 05:47(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 04:56最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 04:54(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.06297

Speaker-Consistent Grounding for Confusion-Resilient LLM-Based Target Speech Extraction

Hanyu Meng, Hao Shi, Zhanhong He, Qiquan Zhang, Yang Xiao, Sungwoo Cho, Haowei Lou, Haizhou Li

Deterministic target-speaker extraction (TSE) tends to preserve observed linguistic content but may extract the interfering speaker. In contrast, autoregressive generative TSE improves perceptual quality, but is prone to content hallucination and speaker identity drift, which can be mitigated by model grounding with the evidence from the deterministic TSE. However, grounding such a generative TSE model with speaker-confused evidence may therefore reinforce the error. To address this gap, we proposed a repair-before-grounding framework with a training-free evidence-repair stage. Conditioning-diverse candidate selection (CDCS) selects target speaker-consistent evidence from complementary frozen TSE outputs. The selected waveform can then be used by code-space grounding (CSG) to constrain LLM-based TSE decoding. On Libri2Mix, CDCS reduces wrong-speaker extraction errors from 6.87% to 0.75% on clean mixtures and from 18.95% to 10.46% under noise. With the LLM-based TSE checkpoint unchanged, CSG further reduces noisy content- and acoustic-switch rates from 12.79% and 1.68% to 9.10% and 0.51%, respectively. Despite this stronger grounding, generative TSE retains its predicted perceptual-quality advantage over direct deterministic extraction. These results show that repairing evidence identity before grounding improves the reliability of generative TSE. Audio demos and code are available at https://hanyu-meng.github.io/LLM-TSE-Grounding-Demo/.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

eess.AS · cs.SD
arXiv ↗PDF ↗