跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科，以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词，把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1673新增论文
+1257其中 AI 相关
+198已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描：2026-11-13 22:39 · 全站最近入库：2026-11-13 20:44各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 23:19 — 2026-11-13 23:19（北京时间） · 点击数字查看对应简报；AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查：2026-11-13 22:39最近发现新增版本：2026-11-13 20:44库内论文最新更新时间：2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常；新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,727 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

研究日报 / 周报 →按信源浏览 →

时间范围跟随排序：版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常，查看状态 →

找到 5 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 22:37（北京时间）
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.16872

ACE-CaP-0: Real-World Code-as-Policies in the Era of Experience

ACE-CaP Team, Changxu Wei, Yunpeng Qing, Guozheng Ma, Bowen Liu, Zexin He, Yilun Kong, Haoming Gu 等 28 位作者

原文摘要

Recent advances in frontier models have pushed the boundaries of agentic robot control, enabling agents to perform complex robotic tasks through reasoning and interaction. However, repeated calls to these models during execution can substantially increase task completion time. Code as Policies (CaP) offers a route for coding agents to acquire physical skills through experience and retain them in executable programs, allowing the reasoning invested in development to be reused across runs. Developing reliable code policies while limiting the cost of physical experimentation remains a central challenge. We investigate human guidance as a source of priors for feasible actions and simulation as an auxiliary environment for exploring and testing candidate policies. Our findings favor robot demonstrations available on request and simulation used selectively during real-world policy refinement. These findings inform ACE-CaP-0, an agentic recipe that couples policy revision with experience acquisition through Demonstrations on Request and Simulation on Demand. Across eight real-world manipulation tasks spanning alignment, multi-object handling, and bimanual coordination, the resulting frozen programs achieve 92.1\% success (221/240 trials). Mean execution times across tasks range from 0.97 to 2.27 minutes. The programs execute with runtime perception and control, without a human or coding agent in the loop. These results highlight CaP's potential to turn experience into reliable, reusable physical skills.

cs.RO

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15189

WordInferBench: Can Agents Infer How to Edit from Word Document Context?

Jiayu Ding, Yupan Huang, Jinyoung Park, Yilin Jia, Wenshan Wu, Tengchao Lv, Shaohan Huang, Yuzhong Zhao 等 17 位作者

原文摘要

Document editing is among the most common knowledge-work tasks, yet existing benchmarks for evaluating autonomous agents on Word document editing provide fully specified attribute-modification instructions. They do not evaluate agents' ability to infer the appropriate attributes from document context, a capability essential in real-world editing where users expect consistency without spelling out every attribute. We introduce WordInferBench, a benchmark comprising 280 base document-editing instances, each paired with three instruction conditions: descriptive (the instruction explicitly lists every attribute change), referential (the instruction points to another object as an exemplar), and inferential (the agent must examine document context to infer what attributes to apply). To evaluate contextual attribute inference, each base instance is constructed so that the target formatting is recoverable from an in-document exemplar. The instances are derived from real Word documents collected from Common Crawl and cover 13 object types and 81 attributes. We evaluate six recent coding-agent systems and find that the best-performing evaluated system, Claude Code with Opus 4.6, achieves a 62.9% task-level pass rate on descriptive variants but only 40.7% on inferential variants, indicating that current systems complete tasks less reliably when the required formatting changes must be determined from document context.

cs.AI

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.10475

WordEval: Evaluating Word-Native Operation Fidelity in Document Editing

Jinyoung Park, Yupan Huang, Shimin Zhang, Jiayu Ding, Yilin Jia, Yuzhong Zhao, Tengchao Lv, Wenshan Wu 等 21 位作者

原文摘要

Microsoft Word is a central environment for office automation, and the faithful execution of its editing operations is an important capability for document agents. Unlike plain-text editing, editing in Word modifies a structured object model, where the requested effect is realized in object properties. Existing benchmarks, however, evaluate office workflows or desktop automation, treating word-processor documents as one task domain among many and verifying outcomes with keyword matching, per-task property checks, or screenshot comparison. We introduce WordEval, an operation-fidelity benchmark that instead centers evaluation on Word editing operations, testing whether each requested edit is realized as intended changes to Word objects and properties. It contains 642 cases across 15 Word feature areas, ranging from text and lists to charts, shape geometry, and SmartArt. 546 atomic cases cover 231 commands, 96 compositional cases combine multiple edits in a single document, and a Word-native oracle checks task-specific object properties and preservation conditions. Cases are constructed from editing-unit specifications, yielding controlled input documents, reference documents, and aligned oracle checks. Each compositional case is linked to corresponding atomic cases, supporting fine-grained diagnosis of editing failures. We evaluate eight agent systems and find that many struggle on the Atomic track, with performance varying across feature areas. Moreover, every system scores lower on Compositional than on Atomic, with gaps that vary substantially by system. Exact atomic-intent links and recorded failure diagnoses provide complementary views of this variation.

cs.CV

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1981ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

BioProAgent: Neuro-Symbolic Grounding for Constrained Scientific Planning

Yuyang Liu, Jingya Wang, Liuzhenghao Lv, Yonghong Tian Peking University

原文摘要

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant reasoning capabilities in scientific discovery but struggle to bridge the gap to physical execution in wet-labs. In these irreversible environments, probabilistic hallucinations are not merely incorrect; they can cause equipment damage or experimental failure. To address this, we propose BioProAgent, a neuro-symbolic framework that anchors probabilistic planning in a deterministic Finite State Machine (FSM). We introduce a State-Augmented Planning mechanism that enforces a rigorous Design-Verify-Rectify workflow, ensuring hardware compliance before execution. Furthermore, we address the context bottleneck inherent in complex device schemas by Semantic Symbol Grounding, reducing token consumption by \sim6\times through symbolic abstraction. In the extended BioProBench benchmark, BioProAgent achieves 95.6% physical compliance (compared to 21.0% for ReAct), demonstrating that neuro-symbolic constraints are essential for reliable autonomy in irreversible physical environments. Code at https://github.com/YuyangSunshine/bioproagent and Website at https://yuyangsunshine.github.io/BioPro-Project/ .

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.899ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

ReFL: Reflective Feedback Learning for Hallucination Detection of Large Language Models

Cunhang Fan, Jun Zhang, Xue Zhang, Shuai Zhang, Zhao Lv Anhui University, Jianhua Tao Tsinghua University, Zhengqi Wen Tsinghua University

原文摘要

Large Language Models (LLMs) often generate factually incorrect content, known as “hallucinations”, which undermine the reliability and safety of their outputs. Existing hallucination detection methods either depend on external knowledge sources, incurring high computational costs and limiting real-time applicability, or extract the model’s internal states, leading to poor generalization. To address these issues, this paper proposes ReFL, a hallucination detection framework. ReFL leverages corrective in-context learning to dynamically guide LLMs to recognize their own prediction errors and adjust internal representations, critically without updating model weights. Specifically, by introducing a corrective in-context learning strategy, where triplets of input text, model prediction, and ground-truth label are embedded into the prompt to make the model explicitly aware of its own errors. The model reflects on prior outputs to adjust its internal states and generate semantically structured representations better aligned with factuality. This feedback mechanism encourages the model to shape a more coherent semantic space and enhances the LLM’s internal sensitivity to hallucinations. Experimental results on two benchmark datasets demonstrate that ReFL consistently outperforms existing methods, achieving state-of-the-art performance.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表