跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+3已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-14 18:17 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-13 18:31 — 2026-11-14 18:31(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-14 18:17最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-14 18:15(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.14601

VASTRA: Efficient Agentic Top-K Interactive Video Analysis

Tushar Tyagi, Aditya Raghavan, Haoran Qiu, Francisco Romero

原文摘要

Vision-language models (VLMs) enable natural language video retrieval, bypassing traditional hand-engineered pipelines. Integrating agentic reasoning frameworks (e.g., ReAct) further advances this paradigm by allowing models to dynamically inspect video content rather than relying on a single visual pass. Applying this pattern naively to video retrieval inherits problems that video systems cannot afford: results vary from run to run under identical conditions, and cost and latency scale with every reasoning step the agent takes rather than with the work the query actually requires. We present VASTRA, an agentic video retrieval system whose execution is dictated by query complexity rather than an open-ended reasoning loop: cheap, reliably answerable queries are ranked directly from pre-ingested summaries, while harder queries trigger targeted verification only where relevance is genuinely uncertain. This keeps control flow external to the model rather than latent in a growing chain of thought, establishing deterministic control flow by construction and end-to-end rank reproducibility under greedy serving. Across 40 benchmark queries, VASTRA exposes explicit presets: VASTRA-Fast runs 12.2x faster (4.2 s vs. 51.2 s) and 10.4x cheaper ($0.0044 vs. $0.0458) than best performing ReAct agent at a 5.0-point mAP reduction, while VASTRA-Max matches peak ReAct agent accuracy (0.653 vs. 0.649 mAP) at comparable latency, trading higher spend ($0.1022 vs. $0.0458) for zero run-to-run variance.

cs.DB

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.13176

SHADOWPREFILL: Keeping Your Next Model Warm for Per-Step Model Routing in Agentic LLM Serving

Haoran Qiu, Rohan Mahapatra, Rodrigo Fonseca, Mark Russinovich

原文摘要

Per-step model routers send each LLM call of an agent to the cost-optimal model dynamically within each session. However, every model switch discards prefix-cache reuse: KV caches are per model, so the new model must prefill the relevant context before it emits a token. Across representative agentic workloads, including a production coding-agent trace with a mean context of 63K tokens, the prefix hit rate falls from 80-89% on same model calls to 44-65% after a switch, and a switch call takes 1.5-3.2x as long. We present SHADOWPREFILL, which prefills the session's context on the model the router has not chosen, in capacity that instances serving normal traffic leave idle, so the next switch finds its prefix cached. SHADOWPREFILL harvests the per-iteration SLO slack of requests in flight, protects routed calls, spills shadow KV to host memory, and falls back to a cold switch whenever the shadow is incomplete. With LLMRouter routing 24 model pairs over five agentic benchmark suites, SHADOWPREFILL cuts switch-call latency by 8.5-21.4%, LLM-call latency by 3.7-17.7%, and routed token cost by 22.5-46.1%, while normal traffic keeps its SLO and energy per request rises by 0.4%.

cs.DC