跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1030新增论文
+790其中 AI 相关
+127已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 21:33 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-11 18:36各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 22:03 — 2026-11-11 22:03(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 21:33最近发现新增版本:2026-11-11 18:36库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,673 已收录论文18,321 AI 相关6,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 21:29(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.10521

TimeHF 2.0: Multimodal, Multivariate, and Multi-Region Collaborative Forecasting for Large-Scale Retail Supply Chains

Zhongxuan Han, Zhengxin Shi, Kunxiu Chen, Xiaolin Huang, Yulin Huang, Anni Zhang, Xiaoming Lin, Zhengyu Chen 等 33 位作者

原文摘要

Large-scale retail supply chains need sales forecasts for specified products, future dates or planning windows, and regions under the conditions available at the forecast origin. Regional sparsity, changing environments, volatile sales, and unfamiliar business situations make these dimensions difficult to model together. We introduce TimeHF 2.0, a multimodal, multivariate, and multi-region collaborative forecasting framework that makes flexibly expressed business knowledge usable in numerical prediction. A coverage-aware directed encoder integrates regional sales and applicable covariates. A semantic alignment module transfers language-model hidden representations of natural-language plans and domain experience into target-specific forecasting context. Learning against sales observations connects these meanings to numerical evidence, allowing business users to supply experience, future plans, and changing circumstances without defining a new numerical feature for each description. Text-conditioned future queries and shared/routed experts adapt prediction to the supplied context. An ordered-distribution head allocates fine resolution to routine fluctuations and coarse resolution to extreme sales movements, while daily/window learning connects forecasts to cumulative planning quantities. Online parallel forecasting at JD yields relative accuracy improvements of 18.25% and 17.94% for national daily and planning-window sales, and 19.44% and 18.99% for DC daily and planning-window sales, over the original production deep learning baseline. Component comparisons, loss-design results, and product-type analyses examine the roles of regional information, covariates, business knowledge, context-dependent processing, and robust planning-oriented learning.

cs.AI · cs.LG