跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 01:59 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-07 17:43各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 02:14 — 2026-11-08 02:14(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 01:59最近发现新增版本:2026-11-07 17:43库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 01:57(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05712

Reachability Diameter: Beyond the Square-Root Barrier, with Polynomial Hardness

Hector Tierno, Shuang Yang

原文摘要

The reachability diameter of a directed graph is the maximum finite shortest-path distance across all pairs of vertices. It has received recent attention under this name, although the underlying quantity has long played a central role in shortcut set and parallel reachability. Notably, Bals et al. establish hardness for every polynomial-factor approximation in nearly-linear time for weighted digraphs. Yet they give $n^{1/2+o(1)}$-approximation in the unweighted regime with nearly-linear running time, and their conditional lower bounds rule out certain constants only, leaving open whether polynomial loss is necessary. We give a randomized algorithm that estimates the reachability diameter of an unweighted digraph within a factor $n^{1/3+o(1)}$, with high probability, in $\widetilde{O}(m+n)$ time. We complement our algorithm with a lower bound conditional on the 3-uniform Hyperclique hypothesis, ruling out an $n^{2/15-\varepsilon}$-approximation in $\widetilde{O}(m+n)$ time for every fixed $\varepsilon\in(0,2/15)$, establishing the necessity of polynomial loss for nearly-linear time algorithms.

cs.DS