跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1164新增论文
+869其中 AI 相关
+88已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 04:56 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 05:54 — 2026-11-06 05:54(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 04:56最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 04:54(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2607.18850

MOPDA: Mixed-Trajectory On-Policy Distillation for Language-Guided Industrial Anomaly Detection

Shuimu Chen, Jing Jin, Nan Su, Hongbo Xu, Zebang Cheng, Wenming Yang, Fei Ma, Guijin Wang

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have shown strong potential for industrial anomaly detection (IAD) by providing image-level anomaly judgments and interpretable reasoning. However, reliably translating generated judgments into precise pixel-level localization remains challenging. We propose \textbf{M}ixed-Trajectory \textbf{O}n-\textbf{P}olicy \textbf{D}istillation for Language-Guided Industrial \textbf{A}nomaly Detection (MOPDA), the first framework to introduce on-policy self-distillation into LVLM-based IAD. For judgment learning, \method introduces \textbf{Mixed-Trajectory Supervision}, combining student-generated on-policy trajectories with evidence-conditioned teacher trajectories under a shared token-level distillation objective. Student trajectories preserve supervision on deployment-relevant response paths, while teacher trajectories provide complementary evidence-conditioned supervision. For dense localization, \textbf{Language-guided Visual Anchoring} uses the final judgment as a compact semantic condition to construct image-specific normal and abnormal anchors, which are contrasted with dense visual features to produce anomaly maps. This keeps language as semantic guidance while grounding pixel-level responses in visual evidence. Under a strict cross-dataset zero-shot protocol on five IAD benchmarks, \method outperforms the evaluated LVLM-based baselines on most detection, localization, and judgment metrics while remaining competitive with CLIP-based methods. Ablations further validate both mixed-trajectory supervision and final-judgment conditioning.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CV · cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗