跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-07 15:22 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-06 13:12各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-06 16:14 — 2026-11-07 16:14(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-07 15:22最近发现新增版本:2026-11-06 13:12库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-07 15:19(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.07866

Do Recommenders Need to Think in Words? Latent Reasoning for Efficient LLM-Based Recommendation

Hongyang Su, Beibei Kong, Lei Cheng, Chengxiang Zhuo, Zang Li

LLM-based recommender systems increasingly generate chain-of-thought (CoT) text before each item prediction to activate the LLM's reasoning capacity, costing tens to hundreds of extra tokens per recommendation at inference. We ask whether inference-time reasoning artifacts (textual or latent) can be replaced by training-time supervision alone, without loss of accuracy. We propose LatentRec, a framework for LLM-based generative recommendation that replaces inference-time reasoning artifacts with training-time per-step head supervision. LatentRec has three components. A 2.5M-parameter Continuous Thought Module iterates K latent reasoning steps over the LLM's hidden state during training. Soft Token Selection bridges the ~14x norm gap between hidden states and input embeddings. A Per-step Reasoning Loss (PRL) supervises every intermediate state through the LLM's prediction head against the first token of the target Semantic ID. The trained LLM retains this accuracy without the module at inference, so the module can be discarded at deployment. On three Amazon benchmarks, LatentRec improves HR@10 by 4.0-5.0% (relative) over a CoT-distilled baseline at 18.3x lower latency (batch=1). Per-step training supervision consistently improves accuracy across three datasets, paid once at training rather than at every recommendation.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-industry.130ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Intent-Driven Semantic ID Generation for Grounded Conversational News Recommendation

Hongyang Su, Beibei Kong, Lei Cheng, Chengxiang Zhuo, Zang Li, Chenyun Yu

Conversational news recommendation requires grounding each suggestion in a rapidly evolving article corpus while addressing implicit user intents that lack explicit retrievable keywords. To characterize this scenario, we identify 6 intent types from production dialogues: five are implicit and pose fundamental challenges to standard RAG pipelines, forming a critical retrieve-first bottleneck. To address these issues, we introduce intent-driven Semantic ID (SID) generation under a Generate-then-Match paradigm. With two-stage training that consists of multi-task SID alignment and GPT-4 Chain-of-Thought distillation, an LLM maps diverse intents to hierarchical SID prefixes, which are then fuzzy-matched to the current news pool to guarantee fully grounded recommendations. Profile-Aware Dual-Signal Reasoning (PADR) further enables cold-start users to obtain valid recommendations using only profiles. On a mainstream Chinese news platform, our 7B model achieves 0% hallucination and 12.4% L1 match in the 152K open-generation SID space (4 \times random baseline). It matches GPT-4+Hybrid RAG on L1 while surpassing it on finer-grained metrics (L2 2 \times, Category +1.2pp) at \sim 100 \times lower cost. Cold-start users, where existing baselines score 0%, achieve 18.0% L1 (6 \times random), the highest among all user groups.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 6: Industry Track) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗