跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1087新增论文
+804其中 AI 相关
+107已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-14 11:06 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 20:44各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-13 12:11 — 2026-11-14 12:11(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-14 11:06最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 20:44库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,727 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-14 11:04(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.16589

STVLA: Spatial-aware and Temporal-memory forVision-Language-Action Models

Zhuo Han, Yeqiang Wang, Xinran Wang, Hongwei Han, Yi Xiong, Zunian Wan, Jianbo Mao, Huan Peng 等 11 位作者

原文摘要

Robotic manipulation often requires both spatial scene understanding and task history. However, many vision-language-action (VLA) policies rely primarily on current observations, without explicitly integrating spatial structure and task history. Appearance-based memories can be sensitive to occlusion and viewpoint changes, while spatial representations of the current scene alone do not preserve how the scene has changed during task execution. We introduce STVLA, a framework that incorporates features from a pretrained visual geometry foundation model into temporal memory alongside visual representations. This allows the policy to recall past scene structure as context for current action decisions. To select informative history, STVLA uses a mathematically grounded scoring rule that balances relevance to the current observation with complementary evidence from memory. Across evaluations on LIBERO, LIBERO-Mem, MIKASA-Robo, and SimplerEnv Bridge, STVLA achieves the highest average success rate among the compared methods on each benchmark. On real-world block stacking, object organization, and phone packaging, it improves success over $π_{0.5}$ by $58.33$, $30.00$, and $35.00$ percentage points, respectively. These results support integrating scene geometry into temporal memory to improve manipulation requiring both spatial precision and task history. Project website: \href{https://stvla.github.io/}{https://stvla.github.io/}

cs.RO

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.12806

面向通用灵巧操作的异构触觉表征学习

Learning Heterogeneous Tactile Representation for General Dexterous Manipulation

Bing Han, Yichuan Peng, Haoyu Dong, Yuanmeng Hu, Yongyi Jia, Fangjing Wang, Kecheng Zheng, Yiming Zhang 等 19 位作者

AI 速读 基于摘要

提出触觉基础模型 LingBot-Touch,将压阻、磁性与视触觉等异构传感器数据统一表征,并以即插即用方式增强多种策略模型的灵巧操作能力。

cs.RO

查看原文摘要

Tactile sensing is an indispensable modality for contact-rich dexterous manipulation, a capability that hints at the ultimate frontiers of embodied intelligence. However, commercially available tactile sensors are still at a relatively early stage of development, with each type of sensor offering irreplaceable strengths alongside its own drawbacks. A key challenge is thus to free tactile understanding from sensor-specific physics, so that embodied models can effectively leverage heterogeneous tactile data. To this end, we develop LingBot-Touch, a tactile foundation model characterized by the following properties. (i) Our model yields a unified representation across different tactile sensors (i.e., piezoresistive, magnetic, and visuotactile sensors), and is easily extensible to new sensor types. (ii) The resulting tactile tokens are plug-and-play: they can be seamlessly integrated into policy models across paradigms, from diffusion policy to vision-language-action (VLA) models such as $π_{0.5}$ and LingBot-VLA, consistently enhancing manipulation dexterity. (iii) Extensive experiments, spanning simulation and real-robot deployments across multiple hardware platforms, demonstrate that our tactile representation substantially benefits complex manipulation tasks while maintaining strong computational efficiency. We believe the findings in this work demonstrate the potential of leveraging cross-sensor data to scale tactile learning, and offer encouraging insights for the design of future hardware and embodied models.

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.10484

Can General-Purpose Generative AI Supply Training Data for Medical Vision Models? A Multimodal Retrospective Study

Jiachuan Peng, Kyle Lam, Jierui Qu, Lin Li, Haining Zheng, Bang Zheng, Aniruddha Agarwal, Zaki Almallah 等 13 位作者

原文摘要

Background: Well-annotated, diverse medical imaging datasets remain a major constraint for vision-based medical AI. We evaluated Nano Banana, a general-purpose image generation and editing model, as a source of synthetic medical images for model training, subgroup augmentation, and model auditing. Methods: In this retrospective study across four imaging modalities, chest radiography, fundus photography, and CT models were trained only on synthetic images and externally validated on real-world data against real-data-trained models. Carotid ultrasound models were trained on a private Human Phenotype Project cohort (aged 40-75 years) with and without synthetic augmentation. Clinicians rated image plausibility. Evaluation used AUROC, AUPR, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Findings: Synthetic-only models achieved AUROCs of 0.877 (95% CI 0.843-0.910) for pneumonia (n=14863), 0.963 (0.948-0.975) for retinal detachment (n=1149), and 0.711 (0.600-0.823) for renal calculus (n=4122), comparable to real-data-trained models, but their calibration and net benefit were not consistently more favorable. With mixed synthetic-real training, a carotid ultrasound model produced an ordinal vascular age index that stratified 633 external subjects into subgroups differing in BMI and glucose (both p<0.01), linking vascular aging to cardiometabolic health. To stress-test shortcut learning, editing a moderate tessellated pattern into fundus photographs reduced the true-class probability for central serous chorioretinopathy from 0.996 to 0.822. Clinician-guided editing raised low-quality CT plausibility from 3.10/5 to 4.30/5. Interpretation: Synthetic data can complement real data in model training, subgroup representation, and model testing via controlled editing, but its clinical value should be assessed with calibration, decision curve analysis, and clinician review, not discrimination alone.

cs.CV · cs.AI