Foundation models have shown significant potential across diverse fields and have been applied to medical imaging, but their robustness across patient populations remains unclear. In this work, we investigate foundation models' ability to generalize from adult to pediatric chest X-ray classification. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first benchmark to compare multiple foundation models under a common adult-to-pediatric evaluation setting while also analyzing the effect of adaptation depth. We harmonize VinDr-CXR and PediCXR into a five-label classification task and evaluate six foundation models and two CNN baselines. All models are adapted using adult data only and tested in both the in-domain and pediatric domains using linear probing, partial fine-tuning, and full fine-tuning. The benchmark reveals a clear and consistent trend: all models suffer a substantial performance degradation when transferred from adult to pediatric data, with drops exceeding 10 percentage points. While Macro-AUROC values reach approximately 92% on the adult test set, performance decreases to around 78% on the pediatric domain. Another important finding is that increasing the depth of adaptation improves pediatric performance on average, although the effect varies across models. Moreover, strong in-domain performance does not necessarily indicate greater robustness to domain shift.
Face morphing attacks, in which the biometric traits of two or more identities are blended into a single face image, pose a severe threat to identity document issuance and automated border control. Consequently, a large body of work has proposed Single-image Morphing Attack Detection (S-MAD) algorithms and benchmarked them on datasets such as SYN-MAD22. However, the majority of these benchmarks operate exclusively in the digital domain, which contrasts with the real-world passport issuance pipeline in some countries, which still requires an applicant-supplied photograph to be printed and subsequently re-scanned before it is embedded in the identity document or fed into an automated verification system. This print-scan step introduces halftoning, resampling, color-space, and sensor noise that are absent from digital pipelines, and may mask the high-frequency artifacts that S-MAD models rely on. In this work, we introduce a print-scan version of the SYN-MAD22 dataset, obtained by printing and re-scanning all bona fide and morphed images at 300 and 600 DPI, and we use it to evaluate eight state-of-the-art S-MAD models trained exclusively on digital data. We additionally repeat the acquisition with a second scanner to assess cross-device robustness. Our results show that detectors that achieve near state-of-the-art performance in the digital domain suffer a more than threefold increase in average equal error rate, with the same qualitative degradation observed across both scanning devices, exposing a critical, previously under-reported gap between digital-benchmark performance and robustness to print-scan degradation.