跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+7272新增论文
+6090其中 AI 相关
+125已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 15:20 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 16:03 — 2026-11-05 16:03(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 15:20最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 15:18(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2608.25213

Pseudorandom Functions in $\mathsf{NC}^1$ from LWE/LPN/CDH (Or: How to Build Low-Depth PRFs, Generically)

Youlong Ding, Aayush Jain, Ilan Komargodski

We obtain new $\mathsf{NC}^1$-computable pseudorandom functions (PRFs) from various standard assumptions, resolving several long-standing open problems. Concretely, for the first time, we obtain $\mathsf{NC}^1$-computable PRFs: (1) from the \textbf{Learning With Errors (LWE)} assumption with a polynomial modulus-to-noise ratio, improving upon prior low-depth constructions that required Ring-LWE with super-polynomial ratios [Banerjee-Peikert-Rosen, EUROCRYPT 2012]; (2) from the \textbf{Learning Parity with Noise (LPN)} assumption, removing the need for structured LPN variants [Boyle et al., FOCS 2020], [Ding-Jain-Komargodski, STOC 2025], [Ding-Jain-Komargodski, TCC 2026]; (3) from the \textbf{Computational Diffie-Hellman (CDH)} assumption; prior works relied on the stronger Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) or generalized Diffie-Hellman (GDH) assumptions [Naor-Reingold, FOCS '97, J. ACM '04]. Technically, our results follow from a new generic transformation that converts weak PRFs computable in depth $d(n) = Ω(\log n)$ to (strong) PRFs computable in depth $O(d(n))$. Roughly speaking, our approach combines \emph{tapering} the internal state of the classical GGM tree (so that the per-leveldepth decreases geometrically) with a two-stage security proof that transitions from a computational to an information-theoretic argument.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CC
arXiv ↗PDF ↗