跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+7272新增论文
+6090其中 AI 相关
+125已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 15:20 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 15:40 — 2026-11-05 15:40(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 15:20最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 15:18(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.04353

XOR-Functions and Beyond in the Random Query Model

Sumegha Garg, Janani Sundaresan, Santhoshini Velusamy

We study time--space tradeoffs for computing Boolean functions $f:\{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}$ in the random query model. On input $x$, a branching program receives independent samples $(i,x(i))$, where $i$ is uniform in $[n]$. We want to evaluate $f(x)$ while minimizing the width $2^S$ and the length $T$ of the branching program. There is a simple upper bound of $T = \tilde{O}(n)$, $S = O(n)$: coupon-collector shows that $\tilde{O}(n)$ samples suffice, and they can be stored in $O(n)$ space. Raz and Zhan (ITCS 2020) introduced this model and studied the zero-error setting. In the bounded-error setting, Dinur (SODA 2024) proved $TS = \tildeΩ(n \cdot inf[f])$, where $inf[f]$ is the total influence of $f$. For many functions with low influence such as Equality and Tribes, this lower bound can leave a substantial gap from the best known upper bounds. Our main result is a stronger lower bound of $T(S+\log T) = Ω(n \cdot sens[g])$ for any XOR-function $g(x,y)= f(x \oplus y)$, where $sens[g]$ is the sensitivity of $g$. Through simple corollaries, we get tight nearly-quadratic time--space lower bounds for Tribes and Equality, despite their low influence. Our proof introduces a new notion of information complexity tailored to the random query model along with a corresponding direct-sum argument which may be of independent interest. Dinur also proved a tight bound of $TS = Ω(n^2)$ for Majority, whose influence is only $Θ(\sqrt{n})$, and asked whether an alternative characterization of Boolean functions could give a unified proof of tight results for a broader class of functions, including Majority. We answer this open question by proving $TS = \tildeΩ(n \cdot dgn[f])$, where $dgn[f]$ is the degeneracy of the sensitivity graph of $f$ (for Majority, this is $Θ(n)$). We also prove that this bound is tight for all symmetric functions up to logarithmic factors.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.DS
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.36577

An Unconditional Space-Approximation Lower Bound for Semi-Streaming Matching

Yang P. Liu, Kheeran Naidu, Hoai-An Nguyen, Janani Sundaresan

We prove the first unconditional lower bound tradeoff between the number of passes and the approximation factor of maximum matchings in the semi-streaming model. Specifically, we show that any algorithm that outputs an $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximation to maximum matching requires $Ω(\log(1/\varepsilon))$ passes for constant $\varepsilon \in (0,1)$. Prior to our result, such tradeoffs were proven only conditioned on a certain combinatorial assumption about the density of Ruzsa-Szemerédi graphs. The state-of-the-art unconditional lower bound rules out any approximation factor better than $(8/9)$ in two passes but leaves open the possibility of a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximation for any $\varepsilon > 0$ even in three passes. We provide two different proofs of our result: the first proof uses the recent hierarchical-embedding framework of Assadi, Konrad, Naidu, and Sundaresan (STOC 2024) along with combinatorial constructions using Ruzsa-Szemerédi graphs. The second extends the two-level Ruzsa-Szemerédi hierarchy of Konrad and Naidu (SODA 2024) beyond two levels and proves the corresponding communication lower bound directly by induction, rather than through a reduction to Index.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.DS
arXiv ↗PDF ↗