跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-07 19:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-07 17:43各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-06 19:38 — 2026-11-07 19:38(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-07 19:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-07 17:43库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-07 19:30(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2608.25230

Trust the Mass: Forced Weights in KV-Cache Eviction

Jack Shi, Jerry Gu

原文摘要

Every deployed KV-cache-eviction rule and every top-$k$ sparse-attention rule keeps a subset of the keys, discards the rest, and renormalizes the attention weights over the kept set. Identifying the exact best subset under that constraint, we find that keeping the largest weights is already near-optimal, since the best subset we find closes only a median $2$ to $5\%$ of the remaining gap to full attention. We evaluate deployed eviction methods in KVPress and find that methods with non-uniform per-head budgets apply attention masks over the full cache because dense cache tensors require equal length across heads. Truncating each head to the target budget lowers benchmark scores by $14$ to $62$ points, and computing token importance with the question in context accounts for $87.6$ points in retrieval accuracy. We propose ContourKV, a training-free rule that applies KVzip's score under a physically enforced budget. It beats KVzip in $93$ of $160$ benchmark runs across RULER and LongBench while using $28$ to $1078$ times less memory, and ties Compactor, the strongest baseline at equal memory.

cs.LG · cs.CL