Haoxi Li, Sikai Bai, Jianfei Ma, Qinglin Hou, Xiaocheng Lu, Tao Han, Jie Zhang, Song Guo
Learning from experience is essential for building the next generation of agents that continually expand their capabilities. Pretrained vision-language models (VLMs) already internalize rich world knowledge, yet this knowledge is rarely leveraged to drive policy improvement through online interaction. Realizing this potential efficiently remains challenging, as policy updates shift the agent's interaction distribution, requiring the world model to adapt accordingly, while continually updating large pretrained models is computationally expensive. To address this challenge, we introduce Dwell, a model-based reinforcement learning (RL) framework that reframes a VLM as a recurrent latent transition operator, endowing it with the ability to predict, adjust, and act in latent space. Leveraging the VLM's own representations and its dual role as both world model and policy, the agent continually learns from real interactions to anticipate and evaluate action outcomes, and from latent imagination to improve its behavior. Across five interactive visual environments, Dwell achieves the strongest overall performance among trainable methods while substantially reducing the compute required for imagination, showing that effective world models for VLM agents need not reconstruct the future; they need to predict futures that are useful for action. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/Tom111-lhx/Dwell
Zhaoxin Feng, Zheng Chen Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Jianfei Ma, Yip Tin Po, Emmanuele Chersoni The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Bo Li
Alignment techniques often inadvertently induce sycophancy in LLMs. While prior studies studied this behaviour in direct-answer settings, the role of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning remains under-explored: does it serve as a logical constraint that mitigates sycophancy, or a tool for post-hoc rationalization that masks it? We evaluate a range of models across objective and subjective tasks to investigate the issue.Results show that reasoning generally reduces sycophancy in final decisions but also masks sycophancy in some samples, where models construct deceptive justifications through logical inconsistencies, calculation errors, and one-sided arguments etc. Furthermore, LLMs are more prone to sycophancy in subjective tasks and under authority-bias. Our mechanistic analysis reveals that the tendency of sycophancy in LLMs is dynamic during the reasoning process rather than being pre-determined at the input.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表