跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 21:48 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 22:46 — 2026-11-08 22:46(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 21:48最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 21:46(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02455

RLiD: Reinforcement Learning in the Decision Plane for Language Agents and LLMs

Ziyi Chen, Yan Zhang, Jianhui Wei, Jianing Yin, Daoan Zhang

原文摘要

Reinforcement learning (RL) has improved the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) across a wide range of tasks. However, token-level RL assigns an action's advantage to the entire generated response, including tokens specifying the parsed action, reasoning chains, and malformed content. Although the environment executes only the parsed action, variation in how the action is expressed in natural language can introduce additional variance into policy-gradient estimates. We propose RLiD (Reinforcement Learning in the Decision plane), a framework that directly optimizes the probabilities of executable action options. RLiD compiles observations, an optional compact memory, and a labeled action menu into the model input, and uses a large decision model (LDM) to select an action in a single forward pass. By eliminating autoregressive token generation and bypassing action parsing, RLiD avoids invalid action outputs and improves RL rollout efficiency. Our analysis shows that, within a fixed text policy, marginalizing over alternative realizations of the same action removes a zero-mean gradient component without changing the expected update. We further distill trained LDM policies into generative LLMs through supervision on their action trajectories. Experiments on ARC, Countdown, and Sokoban demonstrate improved performance or lower computational cost across several settings. On ALFWorld, the complete training and distillation pipeline reaches 99.3% success in 12.7 H100 GPU-hours, compared with 86.6% in 17.3 GPU-hours for token-level RL of the same LLM. With compiled memory, our strongest Qwen2.5-1.5B LDM and distilled generative LLM achieve 100% success on all 134 unseen and 140 seen ALFWorld evaluation games.

cs.AI