跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 22:47 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 23:23 — 2026-11-09 23:23(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 22:47最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 22:43(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.07896

AffordJEV: Affordance Grounding by Confirming Candidate Regions

Jincheng Li, Yutian Zhang, Jianyu Zhang, Xinshun Wang, Mengyuan Liu

原文摘要

Affordance grounding asks which visible part of an object performs a requested operation, a basic capability for embodied manipulation and human--robot interaction. Most existing methods follow a System Two paradigm: a multimodal language model first writes a chain of thought and then turns its conclusion into a box or points for a segmenter. This incurs considerable inference cost, gives the semantic decision little direct control over the extent of the final region, and makes mistakes hard to correct. Yet locating an affordance is essentially a perceptual judgment that need not be argued out in words. We therefore propose, in which frozen segmenters propose candidate regions and a System One model decides directly which of them perform the operation, generating no text and reading each decision from a single forward pass. Our contributions are twofold. (1) An inference framework that confirms candidate regions level by level, from object to part to sub-part, with evidence passed between the levels in both directions so that the levels correct one another. (2) A System One model trained for this framework: existing System One models are built for general-purpose decisions, judge one candidate per request and are ill-suited to the framework's region questions, so ours learns directly from the requests the framework itself produces and judges all candidates of a level at once. Trained only on InstructPart and evaluated with definition-aligned operation words, outperforms chain-of-thought methods in domain and in zero-shot transfer to UMD and IIT-AFF, is better overall than existing System One models run in the same framework, and needs fewer judge requests. To our knowledge, is the first approach to bring System One models to affordance grounding.

cs.RO