跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 18:35 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 19:21 — 2026-11-09 19:21(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 18:35最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 18:33(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.09715

Intent-Aware Caching for Efficient LLM Serving

Kazi Hasan Ibn Arif, JinYi Yoon, Dimitrios S. Nikolopoulos, Hans Vandierendonck, Deepu John, Bo Ji

原文摘要

Modern LLM serving systems use prefix caching to accelerate multi-turn conversational workloads. They cache the key-value states of previous conversation prefixes and reuse them when subsequent requests share the same prefix, to avoid redundant prefill computation and reduce serving latency. However, achieving a high cache hit rate remains challenging because cache reuse depends on whether a conversation continues and how soon the next turn arrives. Our analysis of real workloads shows that user intent is a useful signal for this behavior, as different intents exhibit different continuation probabilities and inter-turn delays. Based on this key insight, we propose Intent-Aware Caching (IAC), an online eviction policy that classifies requests by intent, learns lightweight reuse statistics from recent serving logs and leverages these statistics to guide an oracle-inspired eviction strategy. Extensive evaluation on real workloads (WildChat and ShareChat) shows that IAC reaches a 34.6% cache hit rate. This substantially outperforms both the previous learning-based approach (18.8%) and traditional methods such as least recently used (LRU, 12.2%), while reducing average serving latency by up to 46.1%.

cs.AI · cs.LG

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.08950

AIM: Adaptive Interaction in Multi-Agent Debate for Multimodal LLM Inference

Wei Fan, JinYi Yoon, Bo Ji

原文摘要

Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) improves reasoning on multimodal tasks, but its accuracy and token efficiency depend on how agents interact during debate. A largely overlooked design choice is which interaction modalities agents use to exchange evidence. Existing methods rely on fixed text- or graph-based interaction, which fails to convey fine-grained multimodal evidence and thus degrades accuracy while inflating token cost due to verbose descriptions. To address this, we propose Adaptive Interaction in Multi-Agent Debate (AIM), an adaptive routing framework that dynamically selects the optimal modality combination for inter-agent interaction in multimodal MAD. Beyond text and graph, AIM introduces task-dependent modality interaction, where agents exchange targeted regions of interest from the task-specific multimodal input, such as image regions, audio segments, or spatio-temporal video clips. To determine the best combination for each instance, AIM first generates a structured baseline response and extracts interpretable routing features that capture which evidence the instance requires, how confident the baseline agent is, and how much new evidence each modality would add beyond the baseline response. A lightweight router then uses these routing features to select a modality combination that avoids both under-fusion (i.e., agents miss decisive evidence) and over-fusion (i.e., redundant modalities inflate token cost) risks. Across eight benchmarks spanning three multimodal task families, \name achieves the highest accuracy. Combining modalities improves accuracy by up to 6.4\% over the best single-modality baseline, and adapting the combination per instance adds up to 4.2\% over the most accurate fixed combination of each benchmark with up to 53.4\% fewer tokens.

cs.MA