Qian Chen, Jingcheng Liu, Minglong Qin, Leonard J. Schulman, Fang Song, Penghui Yao, Mingnan Zhao
We reveal an unexpected connection between two interacting particle systems: Kac's walk and the Kipnis-Marchioro-Presutti (KMP) process. We first establish a mixing-time analogue of Aldous's conjecture for the KMP process on general graphs: the mixing time of the $t$-particle process on any connected $d$-vertex graph is at most $O(\log d)$ times the corresponding single-particle mixing time, uniformly in $t$. As an application, we improve the mixing-time bound for coordinate hit-and-run on the $n$-dimensional standard simplex from $\widetilde{O}(n^3)$ [KV26] to $O(n\log n)$, while removing the dependence on the initial distribution. We then show that the twirling channel induced by the parallel Kac's walk on the symmetric subspace can be exactly encoded by a Markov chain on partitions, which naturally lifts to a parallel KMP chain on the complete graph. We prove that $O(\log d+\log(1/\varepsilon))$ repetitions of the parallel Kac's walk suffice to approximate Haar twirling on the symmetric subspace of $(\mathbb{C}^d)^{\otimes t}$ to error $\varepsilon$, uniformly in all $t$. Our main technical contribution is a new structural property of KMP-type dynamics: conditional product structure, which holds for both the standard KMP processes on general graphs and the parallel KMP processes on complete graphs. Conditioned on suitable auxiliary randomness, the evolution of the labeled KMP process factorizes into independent single-particle updates. Combining this structure with an exact coupling, we remove the dependence on the number of particles from the mixing bounds for both unlabeled KMP models. This bypasses the $\log(π_{\min}^{-1})$ dependency from spectral-gap arguments, which is often prohibitively large for many-particle systems. Using this framework, we prove mixing bounds that are sharp up to logarithmic factors for both unlabeled KMP models.
Xiangrui Meng, Jingcheng Liu, Ke Wang, Miaopeng Yu, Zhengping Lin
Conclusions in power-system research require a clear evidential basis. Researchers need to understand the data sources, modelling assumptions, and solution procedures to assess the conditions under which a conclusion holds. Large language models (LLMs) can help researchers extract information from documents and translate research requests into code and tool calls, but their outputs still require physical validation. Focusing on human-supervised artificial intelligence (AI) researchers, this review examines power-system LLM applications and related scientific workflows, together with physics-grounded power AI studies, to discuss the conditions for using LLMs in scientific research. In the proposed knowledge-physics-simulation-governance framework, LLMs translate information and coordinate tasks, simulators and validation tools test models, and experts retain authority over critical assumptions, safety boundaries, and final conclusions. Research processes should preserve materials for review so that claims can be traced to their sources, computations can be reproduced, and failed attempts and approvals can be examined. On this basis, a staged development roadmap and requirements for research reporting are proposed. Evaluation should focus on research artifacts and their validation to assess whether LLMs can improve the efficiency of power-system research within clearly defined permissions.
How does a computational problem transition from easy to hard? In the hard-core model, approximate counting and sampling are polynomial-time tractable up to tree uniqueness, but worst-case intractable at any constant relative distance above it unless $\mathsf{NP}=\mathsf{RP}$. We quantify the transition from polynomial to exponential mixing for classical Glauber dynamics. On $n$-vertex graphs of maximum degree $d\ge3$, at fugacity $λ=(1+δ)λ_{\mathrm c}(d)$ with sufficiently small $δ\ge0$ that may vanish with $n$, its worst-case mixing time has the form $\exp\{Θ(nδ^2/d)\}n^{1+Θ(1)}$. The upper bound is degree-uniform, and the matching lower bound holds for every fixed $d$. Annealing gives approximate counting with the same running-time upper bound at fixed accuracy. For general sampling and counting algorithms, we establish a robust fine-grained reduction from SAT without assuming a lower bound on SAT's running time. For any fixed $d\ge3$ and $0<γ<1$, a sampling or approximate-counting algorithm running in $\exp\{O((nδ^2/d)^{1-γ})\}\operatorname{poly}(n)$ time along any one suitable inverse-polynomial distance sequence $δ=δ(n)$, yields a randomized SAT algorithm running in $\exp\{\widetilde O(s^{1-γ})\}$ time on inputs of binary length $s$. This power-saving transfer identifies $nδ^2/d$ as the analogue of SAT input length for hard-core sampling and counting at relative distance $δ$ above criticality: beating the Glauber exponent by a fixed power through any sampling or counting method would yield a corresponding power improvement for SAT. At criticality, we establish $O(\sqrt{n/d})$ spectral independence, optimal in $n$ at fixed degree, and degree-uniform Glauber mixing in $\widetilde O(n(n/d)^{1+1/(d-2)})$ time, improving the previous $\widetilde O(n^{4+4/(d-2)})$ bound.