跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+4069新增论文
+3686其中 AI 相关
+88已有论文修订
+108新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 23:43 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 23:51 — 2026-11-05 23:51(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 23:43最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 23:41(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.12830

Cross-Behavior Policy Optimization: Unified Learning from Offline Demonstrations and On- and Off-Policy Rollouts via a Shared Regression Target

Du Cheng, Junyu Lu, Jingfan Zhang, Yuzhuo Zhang, Haoxuan Jia, Shichao Weng

Reasoning post-training draws on offline demonstrations and policy-generated rollouts, yet conventional supervised fine-tuning (SFT) followed by reinforcement learning (RL) separates their objectives and limits continued reuse of collected responses. We propose \textbf{Cross-Behavior Policy Optimization} (CBPO), which makes these sources compatible with one regression loss through a fixed-reference target. Because the generating policy does not enter this target, positive and negative offline completions, reference responses, and current and historical rollouts can share a common reward-labeled record format and replay buffer. As new responses enter the buffer, optimization retains the same regression objective without coordinating separate SFT and RL objectives or requiring stored behavior-policy probabilities, importance weighting, or a learned critic. Restricting the available sources gives offline, on-policy, and off-policy variants, while CBPO-Unified combines them. Across two model scales and four mathematical reasoning benchmarks, CBPO delivers leading \texttt{avg@32} and \texttt{pass@32} performance across benchmarks and data regimes. On Qwen3-1.7B, CBPO-Unified improves benchmark-averaged \texttt{avg@32} and \texttt{pass@32} over SFT DAPO by 2.33 and 4.44 percentage points, respectively. In the replay ablation, retaining historical rollouts improves these metrics by 1.87 and 3.72 percentage points over the no-history configuration.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗