Xiaojing Chen, Jingqi Cheng, Xu Zhao, Wan Jiang, Jingjing Wu
Deep learning-based Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) detection using Electroencephalography (EEG) is fundamentally constrained by the "small-sample dilemma." Prevailing generative data augmentation methods not only incur heavy computational overhead but also risk introducing synthetic noise, thereby blurring classification boundaries. To challenge the traditional "data quantity first" convention, we propose a novel framework "Beyond Augmentation": Score-Guided Classification (SGC). SGC does not synthesize pseudo-samples; instead, it utilizes an unsupervised generative network architecture to model the structural and statistical anomaly degrees of samples, serving as the core "Pathological Prior". This prior, after robust normalization, is explicitly fused with deep feature representations, thereby precisely guiding the classifier's decision boundary. Furthermore, to dynamically adapt to varying channel configurations, we propose a Cross-Channel Spatial Adaptation module, utilizing a spatial mapping mechanism to effectively resolve the hardware heterogeneity of mismatched channels in multi-center datasets. Extensive experiments on the Mumtaz2016 and high-density MODMA datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and exceptional generalizability of our method under the challenging "zero data augmentation" setting and at "zero sample synthesis cost". Keywords: Electroencephalography (EEG), Depression Detection, Anomaly Score, Diffusion Models, Few-Shot Learning
Understanding emotion in realistic social interactions requires more than recognizing facial expressions or assigning affective labels. The same event can elicit different emotions depending on what each participant knows, what they believe others know or feel, and how these nested mental states evolve over time. Existing benchmarks largely study higher-order epistemic Theory of Mind (ToM) and multimodal emotion reasoning in isolation, leaving recursive affective reasoning under asymmetric and dynamically changing information underexplored. Therefore, we introduce AffToM, a benchmark for affective ToM with 1,922 test pairs and 19,759 training pairs. AffToM evaluates Individual Affective Reasoning (IAR), which infers emotions from events and socio-cognitive context, and Multi-party Affective Reasoning (MPAR), which recursively tracks participants' nested beliefs and emotions as new evidence emerges. We develop an event-driven multi-agent generation pipeline grounded in dynamic character interaction graphs that explicitly capture event sequences, interpersonal relations, and mental-state updates. Furthermore, we propose AffToM-R1, a two-stage post-training framework combining supervised fine-tuning with perspective-aware rubric-guided reinforcement learning. Experiments show that MPAR remains challenging, with even the strongest evaluated MLLM achieving less than 60% accuracy, while AffToM-R1 improves MPAR accuracy by 13.38 percentage points over its base model. Our dataset is available at: https://github.com/MindIntLab-HFUT/AffToM.
Shu Wei, Jingjing Wu, Qunyi Xie, Lingshu Zhang, Xiangcheng Du, Yannian Fu, Mengjie Wang, Zuyi Wang 等 12 位作者
Unlimited OCR ushers the era of long-horizon parsing, substantially mitigating the growth of working memory as document lengthens. However, as document length scales to hundreds of pages, the visual context grows substantially, sharply increasing the computational cost of each decoding step and limiting the scalability of ultra-long document parsing. Inspired by human book transcription via localized focus without re-scanning preceding pages, we introduce Unlimited OCR 2, a document parsing model that looks only at what it transcribes. Building on Unlimited OCR, we upgrade all the decoder attention modules to Sparse Reference Sliding Window Attention (SR-SWA), bounding active reference tokens to a fixed capacity and thus sustaining constant computational costs across arbitrarily long documents. By combining SR-SWA with Unlimited-Horizon Decoding Paradigm, Unlimited OCR 2 enables document parsing over virtually unlimited lengths without prohibitive memory overhead. At the hundred-page scale, Unlimited OCR 2 achieves 7.0$\times$ and 5.6$\times$ per-step speedups over Full Attention and R-SWA, respectively. Furthermore, it delivers state-of-the-art end-to-end performance on both MPDocBench and MarathonDocBench, our newly proposed benchmark targeting hundred-page document parsing. Ultimately, the capacity for uninterrupted, one-shot document parsing signifies a fundamental paradigm shift into the OCR 3.0 era.
Wan Jiang, Jingqi Cheng, Hui Zhang, Xu Zhao, Xiaojing Chen, Shengeng Tang, Jingjing Wu, Richang Hong
Web-enabled digital health services are expanding access to physiological monitoring and mental health screening. However, electroencephalography (EEG)-based major depressive disorder (MDD) detection remains challenging across heterogeneous data sources, where individual variability and acquisition differences may affect disease-related representations. In this work, we investigate the use of healthy normative references for EEG-based MDD detection. Specifically, structural and distributional reference models are independently trained using healthy control (HC) recordings to characterize departures from healthy EEG patterns. We develop two diagnostic approaches that incorporate normative deviations at different representation levels. Scalar-level Normative Deviation-guided Diagnosis (S-NDD) summarizes structural and distributional deviations into scalar scores and integrates them with deep EEG representations. Feature-level Normative Deviation-guided Diagnosis (F-NDD) retains dimension-wise residuals and combines them with deep EEG representations through attention-based aggregation and auxiliary supervision. We also employ target HC-assisted score calibration for cross-source evaluation without updating the trained models. Experiments on two public EEG datasets examine both approaches under subject-independent within-source and bidirectional cross-source settings. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of normative deviation-guided diagnosis across different evaluation settings.
Context. Coding agents increasingly contribute tests through pull requests that developers then maintain, so how testing work is divided affects long-term maintainability. Objective. We compare pull requests in which developers and coding agents collaborate (agent-supported) with pull requests without detectable agent involvement (human-authored) along five dimensions: the frequency and extent of test changes, their type and context, test structure, test smells, and code coverage. Method. We analyze 114,134 pull requests merged between January 2025 and April 2026 in 391 Java repositories, identifying five coding agents through pull-request-level and commit-level signals. Since agent adoption varies across projects, we compare the two groups within repositories with mixed-effects models that control for change size. Results. Pooled across repositories, both groups change test code almost equally often; within repositories, the odds that an agent-supported pull request does so are 1.65 times higher. Agent-supported pull requests add tests more often (odds ratios 1.50-1.58) and modify (0.70-0.76) and delete (0.51-0.77) them less often. We detect no difference in most structural characteristics of the tests they add, which more often have an oracle, nor, in the 95 repositories we could build, in the coverage of their production changes; in test-only pull requests, however, their tests cover less of the code they exercise. Differences in test smells are borderline and not reproduced for individual test methods. Conclusions. Agent participation is associated with a different mix of testing work, which pooled comparisons across projects can hide or reverse; its relationship with test quality remains uncertain.
Jincheng Liu, Sijun He Tencent, Jingjing Wu, Xiangsen Wang, Yang Chen, Zhaoqi Kuang, Siqi Bao, Yuan Yao
Recent large language models (LLMs) have shown strong reasoning capabilities. However, a critical question remains: do these models possess genuine strategic reasoning, or do they primarily excel at pattern recognition? To address this, we present ChessArena, a chess-based testbed for evaluating LLMs. Chess demands strategic reasoning, precise rule adherence, and the ability to track complex game states. ChessArena is a competitive framework where LLMs play against each other under four play modes. We evaluate 13 LLMs across over 800 games, testing basic understanding, move selection, and puzzle solving. Results reveal significant shortcomings: no model beats Maia-1100 (human amateur level), and some lose to random play. We also present a strong baseline: our fine-tuned Qwen3-8B substantially improves performance, approaching much larger state-of-the-art reasoning models.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表