Jiajun Fan, Roger Ren, Jingyuan Li, Rahul Pandey, Prashanth Gurunath Shivakumar, Ankur Gandhe, Yile Gu, Ge Liu 等 9 位作者
Reinforcement learning has made Audio Large Language Models (Audio LLMs) better reasoners, but the reward that drives it still comes from outside the model: a final-answer check, a hand-crafted process score, or an external LLM judge that stays fixed while the policy improves. We show that an Audio LLM can supply this reward itself, and can do so recursively: each improved model becomes the critic that trains its successor, so the training signal improves along with the model. We introduce AudioRSI (Recursively Self-Improving Audio Reasoners), a reinforcement learning framework in which a single model plays two roles: as an actor it generates reasoning paths, and as a critic it compares them pairwise, turning its own judgments into a process-level reward. The critic is periodically replaced by the current policy, which closes the recursive loop. Because the critic hears the same recording as the actor, it can reject reasoning that cites acoustic evidence the audio does not contain, rather than reward reasoning that merely sounds plausible. The recursion is what sustains progress: under a frozen external judge, out-of-distribution accuracy plateaus during training, while a critic refreshed from the improving policy keeps it rising. Across four out-of-distribution benchmarks, all disjoint from the AVQA training distribution, AudioRSI outperforms strong baselines including Audio Flamingo 3 and Gemini 2.5 Pro on MMAU test-mini, ranks first on MMSU, achieves a clear lead on the challenging Multi-Audio split of MMAU-Pro, and leads the 7B open-source tier on MMAR among methods without external reward models. With no reward specifying how to reason, AudioRSI also develops structured reasoning behaviors (logical reasoning, perception-aware analysis, and reduced hallucination), corroborated by an external LLM-as-Judge evaluation and a keyword-based behavior analysis.
Video models answer from sampled frames and may miss the decisive moment. A common remedy is to commit to an answer, re-examine the video, and confirm or revise it, a loop now mainly learned with reinforcement learning (RL). We find that RL erodes the initial answer, a phenomenon we term confidence erosion, where confidence means the label-verified reliability of the initial answer instead of self-reported certainty: because errors can be repaired later, a correct initial answer earns less reward, and the initial answer stalls even as the final answer's gain over it rises. We propose the principle confident first, reflective second: the initial answer must stay reliable on its own, above a floor set by a reference policy, and reflection may only add to it. Our method, CoFire, implements this principle with one mechanism for each erosion channel: reward incentives, parameter drift, and gradient interference. CoFire reaches 67.0% mean accuracy on Video-MME, MLVU, and LongVideoBench, 1.7 points above the strongest compared 7B method, and improves initial-answer and final accuracy over outcome-reward RL by 4.1 and 3.7 points on average: a stronger initial answer carries through to a stronger final one.
Yubo Shan, Kun Zhang Tencent, Qiming Xu Beijing Technology and Business University, Liping Cao, Yingying Cao, Jian Zhang, Yu Wang, Jingyuan Li 等 9 位作者
Interleaved multimodal understanding and generation—where models can interactively comprehend and produce images and text in arbitrary orders—has emerged as a key research direction in generative Multimodal Large Language Models(MLLMs). Such interleaved image–text content plays an increasingly important role in information dissemination. However, the compounded persuasive power of multimodal narratives also raises the risk of factual misinformation. Despite this, existing benchmarks lack effective mechanisms to evaluate factual consistency in interleaved image–text content. To bridge this gap, we introduce FactVerse, a benchmark dedicated to evaluating factual consistency in interleaved image-text generation. FactVerse comprises 3,000 human-verified instances across four categories and 50 domains, supporting both English and Chinese. We also establish a multi-dimensional evaluation framework designed to rigorously assess factual consistency. Experiments demonstrate that our framework achieves high alignment with human judgments, significantly outperforming existing evaluation methods. Furthermore, our analysis reveals systematic deficiencies in current models, offering critical insights for future design.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.CV
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表