跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1878新增论文
+1565其中 AI 相关
+113已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 12:17 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-10 13:19各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 13:36 — 2026-11-10 13:36(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 12:17最近发现新增版本:2026-11-10 13:19库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-09 16:22

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

20,050 已收录论文17,071 AI 相关5,370 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 12:16(北京时间)
版本更新 · v5arXiv:2607.25875

EvoST: Adapting Traffic Forecasters to Evolving Sensor Graphs

Du Yin, Xiachong Lin, Yue Tan, Ruiyi Yang, Jinliang Deng, Estrid He, Hao Xue, Flora D. Salim

原文摘要

Web-based navigation and traffic information services depend on accurate forecasts as sensor networks evolve. On checkpoints reused years later, updating only shared weights or adding a low-rank node prompt leaves substantial degradation, whereas, in the evaluated architectures, refreshing node identities recovers most of it while the shared spatio-temporal weights are reused. We propose EvoST, a framework that maintains traffic forecasters by refreshing node identities while keeping shared weights fixed. EvoST updates existing identities using recently released labels and initializes new sensors with identities borrowed from behaviorally similar established sensors. Once enough delayed labels arrive, it jointly refits all identities, and a per-sensor recursive least-squares calibrator corrects forecasts as labels become available. Across twelve PeMS region-year settings, identity refresh reduces the relative one-hour MAE gap between five-year-old STAEFormer checkpoints and target-year models from 17.7% to 2.5%, with all forecasters calibrated, and its MAE is 0.7% above that of full-parameter fine-tuning on the same data. In Graph WaveNet, identity refresh recovers 88% of the five-year MAE gap to calibrated target-year models. Similar recovery holds for STAEFormer checkpoints up to fifteen years old, while refreshing STID recovers 67% of its five-year gap. On an annual benchmark covering nine EvoXXLTraffic districts and Transport for NSW, EvoST has the lowest average MAE, RMSE, and MAPE among the reported non-foundation methods on all ten networks, and calibration accounts for most of its Avg-MAE reduction from the matched frozen checkpoints. Code and the extended version: https://github.com/lixus7/EvoST

cs.LG · cs.AI