跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1新增论文
+1其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 07:07 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 06:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 09:56 — 2026-11-13 09:56(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 07:07最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 06:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,676 已收录论文18,324 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 07:05(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2603.24503

Safe Approximate Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Without Expert Demonstrations

Mihaela-Larisa Clement, Mónika Farsang, Johannes Edelmann, Manfred Plöchl, Radu Grosu, Ezio Bartocci, Agnes Poks, Luca Marzari

原文摘要

Repeated online optimization makes nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) computationally demanding for real-time applications. Neural approximations reduce this cost but often require large datasets of expert NMPC solutions. We introduce Sequential Approximate MPC (Seq-AMPC), a label-free recurrent framework that generates complete control sequences along predicted trajectories using parameters shared across the prediction horizon. The policy is trained directly through known dynamics with losses for control cost, constraint satisfaction, and a cost-decrease condition aligned with a feasible-backup safety filter. Building on this filter, we introduce a stage-cost-dependent acceptance tolerance that preserves recursive feasibility, constraint satisfaction, and asymptotic convergence under nominal MPC assumptions, independently of neural approximation error. We further derive Hoeffding-based finite-sample bounds for the expected fraction of applied proposals and closed-loop cost discrepancy relative to NMPC. We evaluate Seq-AMPC on a quadcopter, chain of masses, obstacle-avoidance vehicle, and robotic manipulator, comparing recurrent and feedforward policies under label-free and imitation training. Across four benchmarks, training takes 0.2-1.7 GPU hours per policy without expert control labels. The filtered controller applies 97.2-99.1% of neural proposals and achieves mean closed-loop cost ratios within 0.3% of NMPC on jointly completed episodes. Tests with suboptimal feasible initial plans further demonstrate the benefit of neural replanning.

cs.LG · cs.RO · eess.SY