让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

原文摘要

We identify two constructions from different mathematical traditions. In linear logic and realisability, logical types are generated rather than fixed in advance: one begins with a universe of realisers equipped with execution, uses orthogonality to test their interactions, and takes types to be the biorthogonally closed subsets. In enriched Isbell duality, a quantitative relation induces an adjunction whose fixed points form a category, its nucleus. These constructions proceed by different means; we show that, in the present setting, they produce the same objects. The shared datum is minimal: an associative product, called execution, and a real-valued measurement, with no compatibility assumed between them. The failure of the measurement to be additive is at once the relation defining orthogonality and the quantitative relation whose Isbell nucleus we form, and the types cut out by orthogonality are exactly the fixed points of the associated adjunction. The identification pays off in both directions. The most natural product of types fails to be associative; repairing this failure forces a different notion of type, sensitive to both sides of a composite, on which the induced product is associative and, when execution has units, carries two residuals. What emerges is a noncommutative Lambek calculus, derived directly from execution and orthogonality rather than imposed. In the reverse direction, each such type, read on the categorical side, generates a quantitative relation of its own, and with it a derived adjunction and a further generation of types; these derived types are again types of the original situation, computed by the residuals of the Lambek calculus. We also prove a coherence theorem for the threefold arrangements of this construction and, in the finite-dimensional case, give explicit formulas for the product.