跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2新增论文
+2其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+99新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 00:53 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 01:20 — 2026-11-13 01:20(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 00:53最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 00:50(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.12337

From LLM Hallucinations to Inspiration in Creative Work

Xinrui Lin, Heyan Huang, Shuning Zhang, Qi Wang, Youchao Zhou, John Vines

原文摘要

Large language models (LLMs) can introduce unexpected ideas through hallucinations, yet little is known about when creative practitioners find these errors inspiring or how these judgments shape interactions. We conducted a retrospective qualitative study with 20 experienced practitioners in research, design, and social media content creation, thematically analyzing 41 hallucination cases and 20 semi-structured interviews. Our framework links inspiration judgments of hallucinations based on goal relevance, task stage, content adaptability, and type-specific factors to behaviors across not-inspired, inspired-by, and inspired-to states. We characterize downstream interaction consequences, showing how hallucination-inspired experiences vary across creative stages and reshape role-differentiated trust, and propose these consequences as a dimension of hallucination evaluation. Finally, we derive design recommendations for stage-sensitive control of divergence and adherence, user-defined constraint priorities, differentiated hallucination labels, and salvage support for preserving useful ideas while correcting errors. These contributions deepen HCI understanding of hallucinations and responsible LLM design in creative work.

cs.HC