跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2新增论文
+2其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-12 18:21 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-11 18:58 — 2026-11-12 18:58(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-12 18:21最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 18:18(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.12202

Co-Creating Neurorehabilitation Technology Alongside Lived Experience Experts: A Participatory Design Workshop

Irene L. Y. Beck, Salvatore L. Cucinella, Johannes B. J. Bussmann, Natacha Léon, José López-Sánchez, Francesca Lunardini, Katherine L. Poggensee, Cristina Vázquez-González 等 10 位作者

原文摘要

Involving patients' lived experience (LE) early in neurorehabilitation technology design can improve the relevance and effectiveness of solutions, yet LE experts are often involved only when finished prototypes are tested. We present and evaluate a participatory design (PD) workshop for early LE involvement, examine how LE contributions influence design processes and outcomes, and provide recommendations for similar approaches. We conducted a PD workshop at the 6th International Conference on NeuroRehabilitation. Five people who have had a stroke (LE experts) and 18 workshop attendees (including the LE experts' caregivers) were organized into five groups. Following the Discover, Define, and Develop phases of the Double Diamond model, each group used Journey Maps and Data Collection Notebooks to co-create a solution for an objective specified by an LE expert. Journey Maps were thematically analyzed, and group audio transcripts underwent structured extraction using a large language model. LE input shifted discussions from discipline-based assumptions toward priorities grounded in lived experience, including fear, confidence, sensory discomfort, fatigue, aesthetics, and independence. Narrow objectives, such as opening a blister pack, produced task-specific solutions, whereas broader objectives generated device concepts, including sensory feedback for cycling and a stimulation-equipped cooking splint. Satisfaction was high among attendees and LE experts. All workshop tools and protocols are shared to support adoption. The workshop offers a practical foundation for involving LE experts early in neurorehabilitation technology development. Future iterations should better capture psychological and social dimensions, allow more reflection, and include the full range of relevant stakeholders through sustained transdisciplinary engagement between researchers and the LE community.

cs.HC · cs.RO