跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 21:39 — 2026-11-04 21:39(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38829

Tight Bounds for Anonymous Parity Certification

Pedro Montealegre, Jorge Valenzuela

Local certification is the task of verifying graph properties using certificates assigned to vertices and checked using only local information. A central question is which properties admit constant-size certificates, independently of network size. A fundamental test case is the parity of the network order. Bousquet, Feuilloley, Valenzuela, and Zeitoun (DISC 2026) showed that the complexity of certifying even order depends dramatically on the verification model. On arbitrary graphs, three bits per vertex suffice with unique identifiers and verification radius two. In the anonymous radius-one model, they established an $Ω(\log\log^* n)$ lower bound and an $O(\log n)$ upper bound. They also showed that constant-size certificates suffice in this model on bounded-expansion classes. In this paper, we settle the complexity of anonymous parity certification on general graphs and further investigate the role of graph sparsity. Our main contributions are: * We close the gap left by Bousquet et al., proving that the local complexity of certifying even order in the anonymous radius-one model is $Θ(\log\log n)$ bits. * We show that on graphs of degeneracy at most $d$, parity can be certified with $O(\log d)$ bits, while $Ω(\log\log d)$ bits are necessary. In particular, every class of bounded degeneracy admits constant-size certificates, strictly generalizing the result for bounded-expansion classes. * We show that constant-size certification cannot be guaranteed on nowhere-dense classes, a broader notion of sparsity that includes bounded expansion. We construct a fixed, subgraph-closed nowhere-dense class on which parity certification requires $Θ(\log\log n)$ bits. Together, our results provide a more complete picture of anonymous parity certification on sparse graph classes, showing that its complexity depends on the particular structural notion of sparsity.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.DC
arXiv ↗PDF ↗