跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1673新增论文
+1257其中 AI 相关
+197已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 17:24 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 14:16各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 17:29 — 2026-11-13 17:29(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 17:24最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 14:16库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,726 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 17:22(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15834

Where to Generate Touch: Do Image Latents Preserve Material Recognition?

Wanghao Ye, Aarosh Das, Sihan Chen, Yiting Wang, Bowei Tian, Guoheng Sun, Shwai He, Zheyu Shen 等 29 位作者

原文摘要

Generated touch could extend robot learning beyond recorded contacts. A tactile generator needs a latent space, and we choose one by testing whether a material classifier trained on real GelSight presses still works on encode-decode reconstructions from pretrained image models. On ObjectFolder Real, the classifier loses 6.5 to 9.7 points on reconstructions from three 16x discrete tokenizers and 0.3 points on those from the Stable Diffusion VAE (SD-VAE). The 16x tokenizers again lose far more on Touch and Go and on DIGIT object recognition (YCB-Slide). Retraining the classifier on reconstructions, with no new labels, narrows the discrete gap. SD-VAE reconstructions also keep object identity, with 76.7% object-matching accuracy against 78.9% for real touch and 67.0% for MAGVIT-v2. We therefore select SD-VAE latents and show a photo-to-touch generator trained in them. Code will be released upon acceptance.

cs.CV · cs.RO