跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1163新增论文
+868其中 AI 相关
+88已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 07:02 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 07:07 — 2026-11-06 07:07(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 07:02最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 07:00(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2512.04308

ResponsibleRobotBench: Benchmarking Risk-Aware Task-Level Decision Making for Robotic Manipulation with Large Multimodal Models

Lei Zhang, Ju Dong, Kaixin Bai, Minheng Ni, Yu Fu, Zoltan-Csaba Marton, Zhaopeng Chen, Jianwei Zhang

Safe task-level manipulation requires a planner to recognize hazards, select appropriate mitigation actions, and satisfy their execution prerequisites without abandoning the original goal. We introduce ResponsibleRobotBench, a benchmark of 23 manipulation task configurations with separately specified goals and safety conditions. It connects hazard-category predictions, planned actions, execution feedback, and terminal outcomes at the episode level. Across evaluations of five large multimodal models, terminal safety and safe task completion can diverge: defense prompts increase terminal safety for three tested models but affect safe success in different directions. Correct hazard-category predictions also fail to ensure executable mitigation. In a cutting task under the default configuration, GPT-4o mini identifies the human hazard in all 100 episodes but never requests assistance, and every episode ends unsafe. Offering a help action and actually requesting it lead to different comparisons: outcomes differ between action menus even for a model that never requests help, and repeated requests can leave execution failures unresolved. Imitation-learning evaluations and physical robot sequences illustrate the need to coordinate mitigation with goal actions. Together, these results motivate evaluating mitigation selection, action prerequisites, and recovery alongside hazard recognition and terminal outcomes. The appendix provides task definitions, checker conditions, and prompts. Project website: https://responsible-robot-benchmark.github.io/.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.RO
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.04839

Coordinating Humanoid Loco-Manipulation through Action-Conditioned Latent Foresight

Ju Dong, Xinyu Xiao, Yiming Zhou, Tianshuo Yang, Xuerong Liu, Lei Zhang, Jian Chen, Haocheng Zhao 等 15 位作者

Humanoid loco-manipulation requires coordinated body motion and hand interaction over time, and a plausible-looking command sequence can still drop a held object or leave an interaction incomplete. We present action-conditioned latent foresight, a latent world-action model (WAM) that evaluates proposed command sequences before execution. An action generator proposes joint motion-hand command sequences from vision, language, and the robot state. An action-conditioned endpoint predictor estimates the visual features each sequence prefix reaches and measures progress toward a demonstration-derived subgoal, while a joint temporal prior scores temporal consistency given the robot state and preceding commands. The robot executes the first commands of the best-scoring sequence and replans from the next observation. During training, action consistency regularization reconstructs the first demonstrated command from observed and predicted feature changes, encouraging the predictor to retain action-relevant information. On ten tasks in the humanoid loco-manipulation simulation benchmark SIMPLE, our method achieves 89.7% average success, compared with 73.7% for Psi-Zero and 82.0% for DiT4DiT. On seven real-robot tasks, it achieves 85.7% under standard conditions and 65.7% under unseen object configurations, while GR00T N1.7 achieves 70.0% and 48.6%, respectively. Project page: https://ju6276.github.io/Action-Grounded-Foresight/

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.RO
arXiv ↗PDF ↗