跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科，以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词，把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1新增论文
+1其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描：2026-11-13 07:07 · 全站最近入库：2026-11-13 06:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 09:39 — 2026-11-13 09:39（北京时间） · 点击数字查看对应简报；AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查：2026-11-13 07:07最近发现新增版本：2026-11-13 06:39库内论文最新更新时间：2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常；新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,676 已收录论文18,324 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

研究日报 / 周报 →按信源浏览 →

时间范围跟随排序：版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常，查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 07:05（北京时间）
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2609.22695

A Survey on the Linear Representation Hypothesis

Sewoong Lee, Marc E. Canby, Ikhyun Cho, Julia Hockenmaier

原文摘要

The term "linear representation hypothesis" (LRH) has appeared across diverse subfields of artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and cognitive science. But previous works have not consistently treated the LRH as a falsifiable scientific hypothesis; we analyze these inconsistencies and examine their implications for how prior theoretical and methodological results should be interpreted. Based on this analysis, we argue that claims regarding linear representations become well-defined only through careful examination of the model, representation location, feature definition, and evaluation dataset. We therefore propose a more rigorous formalization of the LRH that makes these dependencies explicit and allows the hypothesis to be evaluated as a falsifiable scientific claim. Finally, we identify some non-trivial open problems that warrant further attention from the research community.

cs.AI

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.150ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Evaluating Legal Reasoning Traces with Legal Issue Tree Rubrics

Jinu Lee University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Kyoung-Woon On LBOX, Sophia Simeng Han, Arman Cohan Yale University and Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Julia Hockenmaier University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign

原文摘要

Evaluating the quality of LLM-generated reasoning traces in expert domains (e.g., law) is essential for ensuring credibility and explainability, yet remains challenging due to the inherent complexity of such reasoning tasks. We introduce LEGIT (LEGal Issue Trees), a novel large-scale (24K instances) expert-level legal reasoning dataset with an emphasis on reasoning trace evaluation. We convert court judgments into hierarchical trees of opposing parties’ arguments and the court’s conclusions, which serve as rubrics for evaluating the issue coverage and correctness of the reasoning traces. We verify the reliability of these rubrics via human expert annotations and comparison with coarse, less informative rubrics. Using the LEGIT dataset, we show that (1) LLMs’ legal reasoning ability is seriously affected by both legal issue coverage and correctness, and that (2) retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and RL with rubrics bring complementary benefits for legal reasoning abilities, where RAG improves overall reasoning capability, whereas RL improves correctness albeit with reduced coverage.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.94ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Contextual Relevance and Adaptive Sampling for LLM-Based Document Reranking

Jerry Huang, Siddarth Madala, Cheng Niu Particle Media, Inc., Julia Hockenmaier University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign, Tong Zhang UIUC

原文摘要

Reranking algorithms have made progress in improving document retrieval quality by efficiently aggregating relevance judgments generated by large language models (LLMs). However, identifying relevant documents for queries that require in-depth reasoning remains a major challenge. Reasoning-intensive queries often exhibit multifaceted information needs and nuanced interpretations, rendering document relevance inherently context dependent and often noisy. To address this, we propose contextual relevance, which we define as the probability that a document is relevant to a given query, marginalized over the distribution of different reranking contexts it may appear in (i.e., the set of candidate documents it is ranked alongside and the order in which the documents are presented to a reranking model). While prior works have studied methods to mitigate the positional bias LLMs exhibit by accounting for the ordering of documents, we empirically show that batch composition also materially affects relevance judgments. To efficiently estimate contextual relevance, we propose TS-SetRank, a sampling-based, uncertainty-aware reranking algorithm. Empirically, TS-SetRank improves nDCG@10 over retrieval and reranking baselines by 15–25% on BRIGHT and 6–21% on BEIR, highlighting the importance of modeling relevance as context-dependent.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表